Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

The Ethics of Peta and The Death Penalty - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
College
Author : hprice
Essay
Miscellaneous
Pages 2 (502 words)

Summary

Capital punishment, more often known as the death penalty or execution (beheading, hanging or submitting to the electric chair) is the taking away of human life due to a capital crime committed following a judicial proceeding. Capital crimes include premeditated murders and more recently the death penalty is awarded for kidnapping in some countries as well.

Extract of sample
The Ethics of Peta and The Death Penalty


Another school of thought presents the fact that an individual who has performed such a heinous crime as murder has no right to live and will be a threat to other individuals if allowed to live. Christianity condemns the death penalty; Judaism approves it and Islam holds it permissible with giving rights to the victim's family to pardon. Human life executions are prevalent mostly following judicial proceedings unless they are extra judicial ones most established in countries of no or uncontrollable law. However, talk on the death penalty pertaining to human life overshadows equally important issues at times. Animals, like human beings have as much a right to live on Mother Earth as their more intelligent counterparts.
PETA stands for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. It was founded in 1980 and came to public attention in 1981. PETA is the world's largest animal rights association consisting of more than 2.0 million members. It not only focuses on animal benefits and security issues but also rejects all forms of sufferings of animals. PETA works in the course of public learning, cruelty investigations, investigation, animal rescue, legislation, special events, celebrity participation, and protest campaigns.
If we focus our attentions ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Is Death Penalty Justifiable
This matter entails unresolved issues on its justification as a rightful punishment for convicted criminals. Death penalty advocates stress mainly that this system will deter crime and moreover give justice or retribution to the crime victims and their families. On the other hand, death penalty abolitionists believe that death penalty does not deter crime but rather promote it. Moreover, it violates the human rights of the convicted criminals, some are may be wrongfully convicted and there is an apparent issue of unequal treatment or discrimination of would-be convicted criminals because of…
3 pages (753 words)
Juvenile Death Penalty
Rehabilitation of juveniles is the main aim of the juvenile justice system not imprisoning and punishing them as majority of us think. Juvenile courts are closed to the public unlike the normal proceedings that are open to the public. Juvenile court proceedings are sealed hence no one see them and they are later on destroyed when the juvenile reaches between the age of eighteen and twenty one years. In law, the news media are not usually supposed to report the name of the minor involved in a criminal proceedings.…
2 pages (502 words)
Death Penalty in California
The executions also included convictions for piracy, rape, rioting, kidnapping, spying and espionage. The death penalties were also executed by the State Government laws. However, in 1972, the United States Supreme Court upheld that all the state death penalty laws were not in accordance with the constitution since they permitted for random and unpredictable adoptions. (The Federal Death Penalty)…
6 pages (1506 words)
Death Penalty in Texas
In array for a killing to be a "capital murder," it have to meet one of the condition explain beneath under the Capital assault.…
6 pages (1506 words)
Capital Punishment/Death Penalty
Public opinion regarding the death penalty has been a controversial subject for many decades. The public's attitude towards the matter seems to depend upon the question that is asked as much as what they actually feel about the death penalty. Thus if given the choice between the death penalty and life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, the public tends to choose life sentences. If asked merely whether they support the death penalty - with no other choices - they support it. It should be seen that a "reluctance" on the part of society to use the death penalty, or a happiness with…
10 pages (2510 words)
Death penalty
Death Penalty is the gravest of all punishments and the Roman Catholic Church’s take on this punishment has evolved over time.This change in view of the Church will be discussed in this paper thoroughly.The paper will start off by giving a history of the death penalty and its supporters and opponents in the past,in terms of societal and religious groups. Then the Roman Catholic Church’s notion on the death penalty and its development is studied. Death penalty is a serious punishment for those who have committed serious crimes such as murder and have caused harm to the society by terrorist…
6 pages (1506 words)
Death Penalty
There can be just a kind of crimes. when it should be applied. However, this creates a risk of the innocent killed. The issue remains controversial and now the every country is to decide if to use it or not. The main criterion is, of course, the effectiveness of death penalty.…
5 pages (1255 words)