The Ethics of Peta and The Death Penalty

Pages 2 (502 words)
Download 0
Capital punishment, more often known as the death penalty or execution (beheading, hanging or submitting to the electric chair) is the taking away of human life due to a capital crime committed following a judicial proceeding. Capital crimes include premeditated murders and more recently the death penalty is awarded for kidnapping in some countries as well.


Another school of thought presents the fact that an individual who has performed such a heinous crime as murder has no right to live and will be a threat to other individuals if allowed to live. Christianity condemns the death penalty; Judaism approves it and Islam holds it permissible with giving rights to the victim's family to pardon. Human life executions are prevalent mostly following judicial proceedings unless they are extra judicial ones most established in countries of no or uncontrollable law. However, talk on the death penalty pertaining to human life overshadows equally important issues at times. Animals, like human beings have as much a right to live on Mother Earth as their more intelligent counterparts.
PETA stands for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. It was founded in 1980 and came to public attention in 1981. PETA is the world's largest animal rights association consisting of more than 2.0 million members. It not only focuses on animal benefits and security issues but also rejects all forms of sufferings of animals. PETA works in the course of public learning, cruelty investigations, investigation, animal rescue, legislation, special events, celebrity participation, and protest campaigns.
If we focus our attentions ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?