Traditionally, Great Britain has opposed the idea of the European Union and integrated Europe trying to preserve national identity and sovereignty. The main claims against the European Union were based on historical, political, social, national and cultural factors which played a dominant role in uniqueness and autonomy of the state…
Its most prominent feature has been the importance of the financial sector, the City of London, both economically and politically. The City of London forms with the Treasury and the Bank of England an extremely powerful economic policy community that has normally been successful in shaping the policy of British governments on major economic issues. Priority has generally been given to the interests and perspectives of the City rather than those of manufacturing or the trade unions in determining the national interest (Aspinwall 2004). There was no similar test for manufacturing. The nature of the City as an international financial centre has always led it to favor a policy of openness to the markets of the whole world, not just Europe. "For Britain, therefore, deregulation, whether nationally or the European Union-inspired, has been experienced as deregulation, with the creation of legal procedures, where informal agreements generally held, and the establishment of independent regulatory bodies" (Schmidt 1997, p. 167). Also, the business cycle in the Great Britain has normally been aligned with the US economy rather than the European economy. This provides a practical obstacle to early entry; but, more than that, it symbolizes a different view as to where British economic interests lie.
Politically, one reason for the hesitation was that the political class in Britain has been much more divided over the euro than the political class in other member states. Popular opposition to joining the single currency has also been strong in Denmark and Sweden, and the Danes voted narrowly in a referendum in September 2000 to stay outside. But the Danish currency is already pegged to the euro, and the Danish economy is more integrated within the Euro-Zone than the British economy is. The political class in Britain has become deeply split, with one of the two major parties, the Conservatives (Giddings & Drewry 2004). The Conservative party was initially the party of Europe, conceiving Europe as an enterprise which was very much in the security and economic interests of the British state, as well as a new external challenge to replace the Empire. It was a Conservative government under Edward Heath that narrowly secured parliamentary approval of the terms of entry in 1971 (Aspinwall 2004). It was the Labor Party whose leaders were prone to talk of 'a thousand years of history' (Aspinwall 2004, p. 56) and who were immensely distrustful of the Common Market because of the restrictions it imposed on national planning. "The erosion of the greater powers of Parliament have been cause for concern not only for members of Parliament but also for the executive, which given the lesser party discipline and the more vocal" (Schmidt 1997, p. 167). Although a majority of the Labor leadership did eventually support British membership of the European Community, a majority of trade unions and Labor Party members remained opposed because of their commitment to national economic planning.
Culturally and nationally, the Great Britain tries to preserve its uniqueness keeping old traditions and social institutions unchanged. For the anti-Europeans, the European Union is a dangerous semi-sovereignty process which forces new states meets its rules and obligations. British attachment to outmoded forms of ...
Cite this document
(“Coursework..'Why has Britain traditionally resisted the idea of the Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/298126-courseworkwhy-has-britain-traditionally-resisted-the-idea-of-the-european-union-consider-the-issues-full
(Coursework..'Why Has Britain Traditionally Resisted the Idea of the Essay)
“Coursework..'Why Has Britain Traditionally Resisted the Idea of the Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/298126-courseworkwhy-has-britain-traditionally-resisted-the-idea-of-the-european-union-consider-the-issues-full.
Why and How the European Union controls dominance. All wealth that fulfills the wants of consumers constitutes the wealth of a nation. Therefore, the aim behind expanding wealth is broadening the choices of the consumers is terms of quality, quantity and variety.
Therefore, the management and the stakeholder of the European Union must come up with measures to maneuver through the very competitive environment of economic empowerments. Due to the rapid growth in developments of the European Union global competitors in science and technology must at least put the European Union organization team in the form to get and innovate ways through which they will try to improve on their skills so that they can fairly compete with the competitors before they get hold of them.
In this regard, the discussion of this policy paper will be focused on critically analysing the policy position and its rationale towards the fiercely competitive economic performance of both EU and China. Finally, the policy paper will emphasise upon relevant recommendations which can mitigate the potential threats of Chinese economic emergence for the EU.
For instance, countries have budgets to, which require expansive engagement with other countries to achieve reasonable growth and prosperity. Countries also have security demands, which they can only address when cooperating with others. In addition, countries have populations that always demand jobs to generate income for sustenance over particular period.
However, this region has recently lost significant market share to emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, China and India (Amiti & Freund 2010, 1). China, in particular, has gained significant influence and has emerged as the greatest challenge to EU’s economic competitiveness in the global arena.
The escalating international interconnectedness has generated novel opportunities, as well as threats for EU economy. For instance, the elimination of trade barriers, investment, as well as monetary flows has allowed EU to amplify its competition, although it has given rise to novel opportunities for EU businesses.
This Directive was to be implemented by the 25th of March 2006 by all the Member States; nevertheless, the UK government did not implement this Directive.
Simon lives in a converted warehouse in Greenwich, which is adjacent to a warehouse belonging to Otis Chemicals Ltd.
There is quite an elongated roll of high historical characters, which, in pretty diverse ways, trailed an idea of integrated Europe. These personalities are Charlemagne, Napolen, Charles V, and Metternich. Incidentally, even the infamous and notorious personages as Adolf Hitler, did intend to deliver a wicked thought of one Europe.
Chabot stated that this revolution involves the solidification of a European market of goods and services, major structural changes in countries plagued by fiscal negligence, and the reorganization of monetary policy in some of the world’s most advanced industrialized economies. The “European Single Market” is “the world’s largest domestic market”.
The traditional protectionist and tariff based trade approach had left Europe fighting for centuries and stopped it from exploiting its complete potential. Well before the Second World War, thinkers had started advocating for a united Europe. The rejection of Nazi style united Europe "Europasche Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft" led the thinkers to accept the American version based on free markets and trade.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Coursework..'Why has Britain traditionally resisted the idea of the European Union' Consider the issues full for FREE!