The article Miranda Revisted: Dickerson v. United States by Thomas Petrowski

College
Essay
Miscellaneous
Pages 2 (502 words)
Download 0
The article "Miranda Revisted: Dickerson v. United States" by Thomas Petrowski examines the issue of Dickerson v United States case and discusses its implication for the law enforcement. It starts with the quotation from Fifth Amendment of Constitution which says that the person cannot be a witness against himself…

Introduction

The author provides the factors under which the confession is considered to be voluntary. The section of passage 3501 is used to protect the rights of convicts, however, despite of this passage the law enforcement agencies followed the ruling in Miranda.
On the page 27 the author summarizes the details of Dickerson case: Dickerson was aware of the rights granted to him by Miranda ruling and has waived them in the written form. However, as the investigation went further, he has notified that has confessed before he received the Miranda warning. The major point was not that the confession was voluntary, but whether it was in fact given before Miranda warning. As the result the case was transferred to US Supreme Court. "The Court not only affirmed Miranda but also declared it a Constitutional rule" (Petrowski 28).
The next section is headed "Practical implication: Civil liability" is which the author investigates the "potential civil liability of individual law enforcement officers and their departments resulting from intentional violations of the warning requirements mandated in Miranda" (Petrowski 28). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

LAW CASE (sheapard v. united states)
In 1933 Major Shepard files a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. A Writ of Certiorari is a document in which the losing party files with the Supreme Court asking them to review the case from a lower court (Techlaw Journal, 2008). This can be done when the petitioner is dissatisfied with the decisions of the lower courts including the US Court of Appeals. A Writ can be granted at the discretion of…
Miranda vs. Arizona
Up until the time of the 1966 Miranda decision, police interrogations varied widely in manner and method. American law, based on English principles, had long accepted that coerced testimony or confessions were unreliable as evidence. This was the premise of the Fifth Amendment that made coerced and manipulated testimony inadmissible as trial evidence on constitutional grounds. Even though law…
Miranda
If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you." ( "Miranda Warning")…
Miranda rights
On July 15, 2003, the California Supreme Court unanimously overturned a murder conviction "based on confessions gained by the deliberate violation of a suspected killer's Miranda rights." (Law 2003). Justice Marvin Baxter was very firm in his opinion that officers have an absolute obligation to "play by the rules when questioning suspects in custody and that their deliberate failure to do so will…
The article Miranda Revisted: Dickerson v. United States by Thomas Petrowski
The author provides the factors under which the confession is considered to be voluntary. The section of passage 3501 is used to protect the rights of convicts, however, despite of this passage the law enforcement agencies followed the ruling in Miranda.…
Case Brief: Dewsnup v. Timm United States Supreme Court
This issue is important because the fair market value of the collateral ($39,000) is less than the debt's amount.…
David A. Sklansky's view of Katz v. United States
(Sklansky, 2006) According to the author, Katz case remains a landmark both because it provides the constitutional framework that continues to govern electronic surveillance, and because it provides the modern test for a 'search' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.…