Principle of Retribution for International Crimes - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Principle of Retribution for International Crimes

h. Without a coherent philosophical theory of criminal punishment to justify international criminal justice, the mere authority or "permission" to apply a set of norms to international criminals remains vacuous. If such trials cannot provide substantive justice in a philosophically meaningful sense, they are more deeply flawed than any procedural objection would reveal. (John, 2001)
The idea that all criminals should be punished for their illicit deeds, regardless of their political position, is at the heart of the modern international criminal law regime. The former argues that the benefits, over either the short or long run, of punishing people such as Goring or Saddam Hussein in a legal forum justify such trials. ...
Download paper


Most philosophical approaches to international criminal justice have focused on the jurisprudential rationale for punishing criminals in an international forum, seeking to defend the normative status of international criminal law against assertions that such trials violate the principle of nullum crimen sine lege…
Author : rberge

Related Essays

International Criminal Justice Essay
There are no guidelines that can serve societies that have endured a governing process that included crimes against humanity and gross abuses f human rights, but that are currently making a democratic transition based on constitutionalism and respect for the individual. Fashioning an appropriate approach is rendered more difficult to the extent that the former regime voluntarily gave up power as part f a bargain with the democratic opposition, and yet remains on the scene, even continuing to control the armed forces and internal police apparatus. The Southern Cone countries f Chile and...
19 pages (4769 words) Essay
Murder is considered the most serious violent crime and its punishment is life prison, long prison life or capital punishment (death). Different states have different laws in relation to murder but the common division is manslaughter and murder. Murder is where the killer thought and intended to kill without a justifiable reason. In this case, the killer does not have a reasonable explanation to commit the crime. Murder can also take place under the felony-murder rule. Where one in the course of committing a felony such as robbery kills somebody else, he is charged with murder although there...
6 pages (1506 words) Research Paper
State-sponsored oppression
International individual criminal liability is, in essence, the ascribing of responsibility for certain crimes against individuals in an international forum. The crimes for which individuals may be held responsible are not simply ordinary crimes of theft or of reckless imprudence. They must be of such a nature that they invite universal condemnation. They are considered erga omnes obligations, or obligations owed to the world. Examples of these are piracy, genocide, crimes against humanity and slavery. According to Kelsen, “The offenses for which retribution may be claimed are, in the first...
17 pages (4267 words) Essay
INTERPOL etc. communications between international law enforcement agencies
These law enforcement agencies are to some extent, geographically restricted in their ability to apply law enforcement powers. The LEA may be capable of applying its powers within a nation, for instance, the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, or within a partition of a country, such as the Australian state's Queensland Police, or, across a group of nations, like global organizations such as the Interpol. These law enforcement agencies that operate across an assemblage of countries help out in law enforcement activities, rather than directly enforcing laws by smoothing the...
13 pages (3263 words) Essay
War Crimes and crimes against humanity
Turkish officials killing Armenians during the war, Germans committing atrocities on Jews, Polish people and others, cases that came up during Nuremburg trials, Russian treatment of German prisoners all came under war crimes. Crimes against humanity include genocide, mass murder, en mass slavery, mass executions, enslavement, deportation, extermination etc. This means any atrocious act committed on a large group could be termed as crimes against humanity. Sometimes these two overlap one another. Paul Touvier, Klaus Barbie, and Maurice Papon in France, and Imre Finta in Canada are a few...
10 pages (2510 words) Essay
If you were a judge concerned with sentencing do you think you would give priority to offender-instrumental sentencing strategies or to those more concerned with moral censure? Explain the differences between different offender-instrumental theorie
The two main strategies or rationales for sentencing are offender instrumental strategies and moral censure strategies. Offender instrumental strategies focus on the offender and the crime in question. This rational provides for punishment that is meant ensuring justice on the part of the criminal and the victims of the crime. The main theories for offender- instituted sentencing include retributive theory, deterrence theory, and incapacitation theory (Davies, Croall, & Tyrer, 2005, pp. 31). Moral censure strategies for sentencing look at the moral aspect of a crime and aim at enforcing...
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!