Sabatier and Susan M. McLaughlin. The book by Mancur Olson deals with an original theory of group and organizational behavior that splits disciplinary lines and the empirical and historical studies of particular organizations help the author in clarifying his arguments. In this economic analysis, the author covers various important subjects such as political science, sociology, and economics and the main purpose of the author is to observe the extent to which the individuals that share a common interest find it in their individual interest to bear the costs of the organizational effort. In Mobilizing Interest Groups in America, Jack Walker attempts "to answer a fundamental question about the interest-group system: whom does it represent and, just as important, whom does it leave out One of my primary goals is to identify the forces behind the recent expansion in the number of interest groups at the national level if government. ...
This paper makes a judicious and reflective summary of these three important works on interest groups and their workings in order to comprehend the essential factors controlling these groups.
In a reflective analysis of the book The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Mancur Olson makes some pertinent arguments with regard to interest groups and his original theory of group and organizational behavior that splits disciplinary lines have great validity in this respect. Significantly, the author also offers vital empirical and historical studies of particular organizations in order to clarify his arguments. In the very opening section of the book, Olson maintains that the groups of individuals with common interests normally attempt to further their common interests and this is more apparent in areas where economic objectives are involved. Similar to single individuals attempt to act on behalf of their personal interests, the groups of individuals with common interests also work for their common interests and it is a popular opinion found in discussions as well as scholarly writings. According to the author, the view that groups act to serve their interests is presumably based on the assumption that the individuals in groups act out of self-interest. If the members of a group have common interests and objectives, the achievement of which would benefit them, the group will definitely strive to achieve that goal. However, the author criticizes the argument that the groups act in their self interest due to the rational and self-interested behavior. The author underlies that the rational, self interested individuals will not act to achieve their common interests. "In other words, even if all of the individuals in a large group