You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 2 (502 words)
In Karen Armstrong's essay titled "Does God Have a Future" the author questions whether the concept of God is still valid in today's world. She sees atheism as a necessary by-product of science and takes the reader through a litany of philosophical discourses to justify her position…
Because by definition this is impossible many philosophers have relegated God to the dead letter box. But God is simply the belief that we each hold that defines the difference between right and wrong, and good and evil. It doesn't necessarily take a 'man in the sky' viewpoint to hold a belief in God or religion. Science changes its explanations and theories with time and so does God. This is not a dead God; it is a living and growing God.
Armstrong contends that a "committed atheism can be more religious than a weary or inadequate theism". She points out that any explanation for God is either absurd or tyrannical. However, she uses the most extreme and lame versions of religion to cast her judgments. The living and evolving God is not left behind as a worn out concept, unable to keep up with science and technology. In fact, this is exactly why people are returning to God. We face challenges in our modern world that can't be confronted simply on logical or scientific terms. The decisions that we make need to resonate with the belief that there is a lasting good to come from them. This comes by being rooted in the 'passionate theism' that guides us.
God may be a new and improved version of the previous over-ruling tormentor and keeper of the gates of hell. ...
Not exactly what you need?