You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Analysis of the Kurt Vonnegut and Margaret Atwoods stories
Pages 2 (502 words)
More often than not, we repeat words and concepts without really considering what they mean to us. Hence, we declare our undying commitment to freedom and equality, even as we devote our lives to fulfilling our, often, materialistic ambitions. Few realize that their devotion to the accumulation of material goods and wealth effectively means that they have surrendered their freedom to their dreams.
Although many of us uphold equality as an undeniable human right, the majority have their own subjective idea of what equality means. Prior to reading Vonnegut's story, I believed that I supported equality as a principle but never considered what type of equality I believed in. Following my reading, I discovered that I believed in equality before the law and equality of opportunity but, definitely do not support economic equality and equality of capacities. Economic equality entails denying people their right to succeed, just as equality of capacities ensures that people cannot strive to become all that they can be. Accordingly, I cannot support absolute equality although I most definitely do believe in the fundamental equality of all before the law.
The equality to which I am committed is an equality of opportunity as would allow people to fulfill their ambitions and realize their potentials. As I am writing this, however, I cannot help but think of Atwood's story and the simple and absolute truth it conveys. That truth is that in the end, we are all going to die. ...
Not exactly what you need?