Comparison of Philosophers

Pages 8 (2008 words)
Download 0
Philosophy is a view of existence, of man, and man's relationship to existence. If you understand that, then you also understand why philosophy is not irrelevant to the "common man". Everyone has a philosophy - a perspective of the world, themselves, and their relationship to reality.


At the closing stages of the series, he said, the objects present no longer relative, but absolute.
Aristotle believed philosophy to have an "ennobling effect on the philosopher, such that he or she is brought as close as possible to divine state." As you know, the common belief now days are that philosophy will provide contentment, or some kind of consolation because of a particular broadening of the mind. For a start too many philosophers' personalities are so different, yet they have fundamentally the same knowledge, which clearly means philosophical knowledge does not make for a particular reaction. A lot of those who do have the stereotypical personality trait associated with being a philosopher have had it ever before they started philosophy, which is equally well known. You often hear people saying it is particular
Note in Book 1 chapter 1 how Aristotle carefully distinguishes between the man of experience and the man of wisdom. Wisdom for Aristotle, aims at knowledge for its own sake, not for the sake of producing anything (e.g. health, material goods, etc.). And since Metaphysics is the science, which seeks after knowledge for its own sake, metaphysics is often referred to as the "first philosophy."
"Clearly then, Wisdom is k ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?