The Never Ending Dispute - Essay Example

Critics underline that abortion is the 'slippery slope', because killing of an unborn child may lead to the killing of other people. This argument holds that we risk a decline in our moral standards once we permit the taking of human life. For example, if we permit abortion today, we will permit infanticide the next day, and euthanasia the next. Thesis Abortion should be considered a morally wrong action and is not permissible because it kills a human being and violates its rights and freedoms.

Life is a precious gift. It is our main concern and duty. Health is our personal responsibility. This requires that we adopt a style of life that fosters health. We owe it to our family and society to be healthy. First, life is present from the moment of conception, and secondly, that life will develop into a human being, unless it is crushed out of existence. In other words, there is already a human being there in its first stages of development, like a tiny rose bud that will one day open into a beautiful bloom. Life is there from the first moment. It is not just a piece of tissue or a growth; it is a living thing, with a distinct life of its own (Colker 53).

Pro-choice advocates maintain that the mother, being a human being, and not merely a machine of procreation, has the right and the freedom to decide when to continue or terminate pregnancy. The State has no authority to prohibit abortion, since this belongs to the domain of the parents, especially the woman, as a matter of human rights. Some people suppose that abortion is moral and permissible because childbearing and childbirth have health-related risks for a woman (Pollitt, 98). It is important to take into account the situation of a particular person when making a decision, and ethical questions concerning human life and the choice of a mother. Because large numbers of women had been victims of unsafe, illegal abortion and because physicians disliked having to choose between their commitment to upholding the law and their commitment to the welfare of their women patients, many physicians sought the legalization of induced abortion (Mohr 88).

Spiritual considerations are important for religious families to believe in God’s providence and destiny. Once we compromise the standards for protecting human life, we compromise all other standards pertaining to human life and well-being. Because large numbers of women had been victims of unsafe, illegal abortion and because physicians disliked having to choose between their commitment to upholding the law and their commitment to the welfare of \ women, many physicians sought the legalization of induced abortion (Kramlich 783). From the religious point of view, beginning with the premise that God infuses the soul at the moment of conception, the church maintains that every unborn child must be regarded as a human person (Stetson 87).

I strongly believe that women who aborted their babies have irrefutable reasons; thus, their pregnancy might endanger their lives or the baby itself has its problem, or whatever reasons the mother may have, we cannot push, dictate or even blame that individual. I don’t say that I am pro or anti but as an individual, I should not be judgmental and learn to understand women who experienced that kind of process. One of my friends made an abortion because she had no choice: she had to finish her education and received a degree. Still, she has regretted it for 4 years of upbringing children of her sisters. For a long time, my friend was depressed and cried nights and days about her unborn child. The issue of moral choice centers on the factor of meaningful human life or personality. From the biological perspective, the fertilized egg is not a human being yet. The concept of individualization is not identified until the first stages of cell division are completed.  So, the fetus is not an individual and a woman does not violate human rights and does not ‘kill‘’ a baby.