President Bush accepted a law known as the "No Child Left Behind" (NCLB) Act of 2001, on Jan. 8, 2002. This new act is a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and encompasses many comprehensive amendments for all public school districts in the state.
Next is the improvement of flexibility and local control. It also provides an increased number of options for parents. Lastly it stresses on proven teaching techniques.
The phrase, "No Child Left Behind" (NCLB) has become a slogan for the federal scheme to increase "accountability" in American education. But despite the fact that NCLB is a federal plan, it will be up to the individual countries to make the plans and procedures that accomplish NCLB requirements. NCLB does not provide the new mandate with adequate funds. Thus this has an effect on opinions of many schools and parents. Many states have implemented this policy by now, but this has an impact on the parents and schools as they had to face many difficulties while coping up with the policy. This article further describes the effect, changes and pros and cons of the policy. (Edwards & Perry 2004)
This act generally stresses on developing American schools to a standard in which all students are given equal opportunities. As in the act it states "close the achievement gap between high- and low-performing children, especially the achievement gaps between minority and non-minority students, and between disadvantaged children and their more advantaged peers." This clearly reflects that NCLB aims to offer reasonable and equivalent opportunities to the students so that they can attain education of high standards. One of the most important terms of NCLB is the obligation that the states should set values in the field of education and should perform yearly evaluation of schools to check the progress of the school and analyze if the schools have been successful in improving the student's educational achievements. NCLB gives funds for the training of teachers; it provides special support to students who face difficulties with reading and supports immigrants and homeless students. Overall NCLB holds the states, districts and the schools to take accountability of the student's achievements. States are entitled to report the progress of students who suffer from problems like reading and writing. They are also directed to report about the students who are from different ethnic groups and who belong to families of low income.
NCLB provides a safe and sound environment to the students. Its aim is to provide the students with all basic needs for studying thus giving them a 'study environment'. It has many provisions which provide a way to improve the whole study structure in U.S.A. The states set an annual report of the students, teachers and schools which is reviewed by the parents. This helps in giving the parents an opportunity to analyze their children strengths and weaknesses. It also gives parents an overview of the school's performance. This helps in getting a better view of the prevailing situation and helps in taking necessary steps in the improvement of the education structure. Each state is responsible for the schools performance in their jurisdiction. The states further report to the NCLB and they act accordingly. (Yall & Drasgow 2005)
While on the contrary this Act has not proved to be a perfect solution to all the problems. According to Darling-Hammond, "The biggest problem with the NCLB Act is that it mistakes measuring schools for fixing them." This act has made the states to decrease their values and has persuaded some schools to enhance their performance by asking the under performing students to leave. This ...
Cite this document
(“Education Administration No Child Left Behind Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/302434-education-administration-no-child-left-behind
(Education Administration No Child Left Behind Essay)
“Education Administration No Child Left Behind Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/302434-education-administration-no-child-left-behind.
Since its implementation in 2002, the NCLB Act has been frequently criticized by the educationalists considering its negative impacts on the teaching practice and the learning tendency of the children. Owing to the educationalists’ negative perceptions of it, this Act has been interpreted as the “no psychometrician left unemployed” and the “no child left untested” Act at different times (Cochran-Smith 99).
The act aimed at improving the education system of America. The main idea behind the act was to take measures to increase student achievements and hold states and schools accountable for the progress of the student body. The act brought several changes to the education system of public schools.
John Adams, one of the Founding Fathers stated: "Education for every class and rank of people down to the lowest and the poorest."
The principles of No Child Left Behind can be traced back to a historical piece of legislation, Brown v. Board of Education, when the U.S.
The new law renovates the federal government's responsibility in public education by requesting America's schools to explain their achievement in terms of the progress of each student. The act encourages four improvement principles. First is to improve responsibility for the outcome of academic tests.
The system could be healed, and NCLB was the necessary medicine.
Four years into the treatment, our schools have not seen the rapid improvement needed to ensure the goals of NCLB. Instead, schools have been forced to alter curricula and rearrange budgets to meet the federally imposed standards.
ive of NCLB is to support and formulate the standards of education and enable the children under this scheme to attain their targets through education as well as by means of individual upshots (ESEA).
The objective of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) is basically to
ade a No Child Left Behind legislation is because the United States Congress and the United States House of Representatives worried about the rise in student dropouts.
This law has several important features. First of all, until 2006, all children and high school students will
The recent past has seen a good number of schools failing to meet the set out standards. Despite this, it is evident that there is no reliable proof regarding the fact that we have stopped leaving children behind. Key to this
ducation policy, the critics, on the other hand, refer to it as a revolutionary federal incursion flowing into the states’ historic domain which leaves too many unfunded burdens” (Barbara 2005). However, the NCLB Act increases the Federal government’s management of local