Is war principally the outcome of state sovereignty (International Relations)

Pages 10 (2510 words)
Download 0
The political aspect of defining what war is, causes the primary philosophical difficulty, however once this is recognized, a description which arrests the clash of weapons, the condition of common tension and danger of aggression among groups, the approved pronouncement by a sovereign state, and so on can be looked upon to differentiate wars from insurgences and rebellions, combined fighting from personal fighting, metaphorical conflicts of values from real or threatened conflicts of arms.


The motives as to why states and individuals may get into war has remained a subject of moral scrutiny
For hundred of years state sovereignty has, been a significant rule of interstate relationships and a basis of the world order, The concept of State sovereignty lies at the core of both the traditional international rule and also the United Nations (UN) Charter. It has remained both a critical element of the preservation of global peace and security and more so a protection of weak nations against strong ones. In addition, the conception has never been as sacred, both in practice or law, as an official legal description may imply. According to past UN Secretary-General, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, "The time of absolute sovereignty has passed; its theory was never matched by reality." (Angelo, 2006)
Practically, sovereignty of states' has regularly been dishonoured by powerful nations. In the present's globalized world, it is commonly accepted that cultural, economic and environmental influences do not respect boundaries nor does it require an access visa. The conception of state sovereignty is extensively ingrained in legal and also political dissertation. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?