The First Amendment says that people have the right to speak freely without government interference. The First Amendment gives the press the right to publish news, information and opinions without government interference. This also means people have the right to publish their own newspapers, newsletters, magazines, etc…
It shows the US president how he played with the American people's sentiments after the terrorist attack in New York and Washington by fortifying his own agenda of oil manipulation. The movie depicts what manipulative tactics he did to win the Florida primaries the last deciding factor for president ship during 2001 elections. His family's relationship with various Arabic tycoons from around the world especially the Saudi royal family, his family stake on oil cartel market, relations to US biggest enemy's family the eminent Saudi fugitive billionaire etc. The first amendment clearly states the freedom for all to do or to say whatever he/ she may wish for. While as in the land of the free as this film was due for release Disney decided not to distribute "Fahrenheit 911". Miramax studios had been told by parent company Disney that it had decided to ban distribution of the film. The reason was according to Disney executive it was that it was not in the interest of any major corporation to be dragged into a highly charged partisan political battle.
Moore said that he hoped that he would have been able to put his work out to the public without having to experience the profound censorship obstacles he has seen often seem to encounter," Moore wrote in the statement on his site.
"Some people may be afraid of this movie because of what it will show," Moore wrote. "But there's nothing they can do about it now because it's done, it's awesome, and if I have anything to say about it, you'll see it this summer because, after all, it is a free country."
Miramax had bought the film last May when Mel Gibson's Icon Pictures backed out, triggering complaints by conservatives to Disney. Overseas distribution rights have already had been sold.
"Fahrenheit 911" was one of the movies at the Cannes film festival. Now people seem to ask what the sheer motivation to prevent its release was. The film portrayed deep resentments which prevailed in US society about the motives at which the Bush administration went to war over a lousy issue of weapons of mass destruction which turned out to be false as no weapons were found while young Americans continue to die everyday leading the toll to a massive 2200 soldiers. It shows interviews of GIs and of families of the fallen who live in utter miseries and now have to live with the fact that their loved one has died for a fallen cause. It shows the deep mistrust in joining the ...
Cite this document
(“Discussing Censorship and the First Amendment Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/303355-discussing-censorship-and-the-first-amendment
(Discussing Censorship and the First Amendment Essay)
“Discussing Censorship and the First Amendment Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/303355-discussing-censorship-and-the-first-amendment.
While trying his best to make sense of the lecture, he became frustrated and yelled “Fuck history. I hate history and all this bullshit. I don’t even know why we need to learn this shit. I am damn sure that our government is bunch of corrupt fools.” Entire class burst into laughter except our history teacher.
This is a common misconception. Some people think they have the right to say whatever they want to or about whomever they choose without fear of legal retribution. This is not true. The First Amendment defines freedom for the U.S. separating it from many other nations that do not allow free speech but not all speech is protected, an important distinction among other aspects of speech this discussion will investigate.
Freedom of expression not only encompasses the rights to freedom of speech and freedom of the press, but also the right to assemble as well as to appeal to the government in case of complaints. The First Amendment, which was implemented in 1791, stated that the congress would not create any law respecting formation of religion, or barring the open exercise thereof; or shortening the openness of speech, or of the press; or the moral of the citizens peaceably to collect, and to request the Government for a redress of complaints.
On the surface, this Amendment seems to provide a lot of benefits to the American society. For example: media has the freedom to provide information to the citizens of US, and the citizens of US are free to fight for their rights that might be violated by the government through changes in constitution.
In our present day, for example, several organizations both in government and outside government, espouse the need to filter media content. Within governments, we have UK's Office of Communications1 and the United States has its own Federal Communications Commission2.
The new American settlers brought with them a desire for democracy and openness. They left behind a history of tyranny and official control of information. Using this experience as their guide, the constitutional fathers wrote into their new Constitution a Bill of Rights, which contained the First Amendment.
It gives them the right to make public opinions, news and information without any meddling from the government. It grants people the right to gather and march in public, demonstrate, protest and carry signs to express their
Adversaries of Hate speech codes claim that if government limits speech in any way, it will include speech, which is constitutionally protected (Gould 43).
Colleges, as well as universities in the United States, have experienced startling increases in