In modern history of mankind, there is no such phenomenon, except Cold war, that would signify highest level of stability, and simultaneously, the highest level of threat at the same time. The Cold war undoubtedly can be defined as a unique conflict, the first and presumably the last of its kind…
As Franklin Delano Roosevelt has stated in his inaugural speech - the only thing we have to fear is the fear itself. During the Cold War that followed, ideological conflicts were often conducted through the medium of fear. While some politicians argued for expanding arms expenditure by raising alarm about the threat of communism, others demanded disarmament and appealed to the public's fear of nuclear weapons. However, the promotion of competing alarmist claims is very different to the situation in the past (Furedi). The abuse of fear is a high stake politics.
The worldview of citizens during the Cold War era has primarily been shaped by alteration between concepts of realism and idealism. These two general approaches in the American foreign policy, dealing with the international sphere, are most explicitly reflected in the foreign policy doctrines. As professor Furedi puts it, the fear has fast become a caricature of itself, it was no longer simply an emotion or a response to the perception of threat; it has become a cultural idiom through which we signal a sense of unease about our place in the world (Furedi).
The beginning of the post bipolar era emerged ...
First, the collapse of Soviet Union, that secured at least the ideological domination of the United States. Second, the Iraq intervention, that demonstrated the reality of the terrorist thread to the world security, but the thread of the nuclear warfare remained, and so did the fear in the heads of most people.
A brilliant indicator of the perception of the world by general public through the optics of the global nuclear warfare is the Doomsday clock, that attain a significant respect and prestige in forming the public opinion since the very start of the global nuclear thread.
The Doomsday Clock, symbolic clock on the University of Chicago wall shows the time left till the outbreak of global nuclear war and the end of the world that would follow. Over the last sixty years the fingers have moved - forward and backwards - only eighteen times. Recently on few days ago, two minutes closer to the nuclear apocalypse: they stopped at five minutes to twelve. The last time we, and the world, were this close to the definite destruction was in 1984. Any sensationalists or fanatic peace activists have not invented this final countdown. Doomsday Clock - the "Apocalypse Clock" as it has been nicknamed with popularity - have been designed by top nuclear scientists associated in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and the prestigious scientific board, or convocation, that is in charge of the decision of whether to move the fingers or not. On its latest session that decided to move the fingers world famous astrophysicist Stephen Hawking has participated. The first time Doomsday Clock were introduced to the public was short after the end of World War II, in 1947 and were set on seven minutes to twelve. The "midnight" symbolizes ...
Cite this document
(“Global Nuclear Warfare Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/303720-global-nuclear-warfare
(Global Nuclear Warfare Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Global Nuclear Warfare Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/303720-global-nuclear-warfare.
The Nuclear Power was the most significant innovation of the Twentieth Century and could potentially affect the Twenty First Century as much as any other innovation. Nuclear energy is commonly understood to the most practical alternative to electric generating power plants that burn coal for fuel.
The cold war was one to the instances whereby there was a case of limited warfare as the US pursued limited goals instead of unconditionally obliterating the enemy. The dangers of an immense power conflict and nuclear annihilation constantly gad a limiting effect on confined conflicts.
Nuclear weapons. Some nations own or possess nuclear weapons based on the legitimacy they place upon themselves, where they are termed as being a source of security. However, many other reasons for which these weapons are in use or exist, which form the base of this essay.
It shows how the world would have been a different place altogether if America did not have the nuclear bomb. During the last days of the World War II, two nuclear bombs were detonated (both by the United States) causing the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and causing the death of 120,000 civilians in Japan.
Through certain controlled nuclear processes like nuclear fission and nuclear fusion we can make use of this energy for our energy requirements. The equipments used for such processes can be called nuclear reactors and the materials used to operate the nuclear reactors are called nuclear fuels.
lly started using those powers for the purpose of destroying life of the common people as well as national property since the 1990s but the process of nuclear weapon empowerment commended almost two decades back. The relevant question is automatically raised though governments
For thousands of years, different states, nations, or regions have gone to war for reason or another. In this respect, history of war progressively shaped the development of nuclear weapons during the Cold War.
The period between
According to the paper there are numerous facades to examine and review the concept of feminism. In one of such conceptualisations, there is the radical and the liberal feminist schools of thought. “Radical feminists suggest that patriarchal ideology leads to the tyrannization of women and children both within the family and within the wider society. Rape and sexual assault are evidence of male power and the family is the key site of its manifestation.