The political spectrum of any nation speaks largely for itself. The same is true with the United States of America (likewise referred here as US or United States for brevity) which has diverse demographics consisting mainly of whites, that is, the German Americans, the Irish Americans, the English Americans, etc.1 The wide range of multi-racial components in the United States is further contributed by the inherent geographical location of the country which is bounded by Canada to the north, by Mexico to the South, and by the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans to its seaside borders…
All the variances in people figures have affected, modified and changed the political approaches and arena over time. The original thinking of great minds in the early civilization of America either no longer exists or has been aptly altered or transformed.
In sum, the multi-faceted US landscape resulted in the growth and development of its politics being intertwined with the ethnic compositions of the social order. Despite these factors, it is very significant and interesting to observe that the American internal political influence is shared by only two dominant parties, the Republican and the Democratic, unlike in other free sovereignties where run-off elections are an ordinary scenario caused by multi-party rumbles not giving a majority vote for any party at first instance..
Of course, there are other groups (like the Libertarian, the Constitution and the Green parties) moved by different ideological or causal beliefs but these are seemingly petty pockets which do not require much attention.
The Democratic Party is the oldest political party in the US. Historically, its founding dates back to as early as in 1790 after those who followed the great George Washington started to struggle for national prominence.4 Ironically, the first president himself did not belong to any political party and he was vocal about being against the establishment of one.5 While the Democratic Party of today is commonly perceived to be liberal, its roots were not exactly identified with that perception. The passing of time together with so much changing of the guards has introduced dilutions. In the early stages of its organization, the foremost pillars of the Democratic Party, while divided, were not totally against slavery and racial discrimination. But if we go back to the 1960's, Democrat Robert F. Kennedy was a moving proponent who vigorously supported the doctrines and actions of Martin Luther King albeit there were charges of inappropriateness on the part of the former anent eliciting private information from the latter. Be it also noted that the Reverend Jesse Jackson, a true disciple of Luther King and one shining embodiment of the civil rights movement, has been a long-time stalwart of the party.
On the other side of the coin, we have the Republican Party which was founded resultant of in-house fighting among the original democrats of the post-George Washington era. Among its major crusades during infancy stage, slavery and racism were condemned. In contrast, however, perception of Republican icons say another thing. Thus, Republican Ronald Reagan was criticized so much for his alleged racist and discriminatory stance despite the fact that he made into law the observation of a national day honoring Martin Luther King and the fact that he appointed the first woman Supreme Court justice. Reagan, ...
Cite this document
(“The Two Dominant Political Parties of the United States of America Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/304722-the-two-dominant-political-parties-of-the-united-states-of-america
(The Two Dominant Political Parties of the United States of America Essay)
“The Two Dominant Political Parties of the United States of America Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/304722-the-two-dominant-political-parties-of-the-united-states-of-america.
This two-party system traces its roots as far back as the American Civil War in the 1860s when the Union and the Confederates battled it out for political rule over its territories. The ideals of these two parties have sometimes been seen at opposing ends of the political spectrum, but for the most part, these ideals have been based on balancing the governance of the American people.
There may be shortcomings; yet its advocates believe that they are of little significance and do not pose a threat to the stability enjoyed by the country today. Thomas Magstadt asserts that continuity is ensured by the system itself, “as the two major parties keep to the middle of the road to appeal to a broad range of middle-class interests,”3 hence the preservation of political and governmental stability.
Due to the fact that the country is essentially divided into two political camps, the public, as can be seen in the election results or voter preferences, is not very fragmented. However, the two-party system has also resulted in sharp divisions among the populace.
The Dynamic of Third Parties, Ross Perot, & Republican Resurgence 7. The Decline of Third-Party Voting in the United States Third Parties in Contemporary American Politics “Response to Major Party Failure” Rosenstone, Behr& Lazarus presents a non academic yet intensive probe of the issue relating to how people respond to third political parties1.
Name Instructor’s name Course code and name Date of Submission Analysis/Content/Critical Thinking essay Ronald Reagan, Lyndon B. Johnson and Franklin D. Roosevelt are considered as the most dominant and active presidents of the United States of America. However, no president of the twentieth century had a more enduring and positive influence than President Reagan; that is all the prosperity and liberty that so many of Americans experienced during that period is owed to the character, teachable qualities and vision of President Reagan.
What makes it interesting though is that nearly all of the countries had professed establishing democracies patterned particularly after that of the United States. In practice, however, as history has proven, military dictatorships and despotic civilian rulers solidly backed by the armed forces and the economic and political elite took control of nations for a decade or more.
They were rich and were popular in territories where trades and big businesses abounded. In contrast, the Republican was made up of debtors and low-income people like the farmers and laborers. They influenced only the places populated mostly by farmers. Federalists interpreted the Constitution loosely to establish a central government in terms of military and fiscal powers because they believed that for an independent country to survive, it needs strong military power.
. The impact is significant. Initially, corruption facilitates drug trafficking, organized crime, money laundering and illicit international money transfers, which can be used to support mechanisms for international terrorists. But the toll on an impoverished nation is even more devastating and real.
Having not elected any representative past the county, by highlighting issues not captured by the general political class, they have managed to thrive. However, their undoing is evident in their slow response to diverse matters.
Rosenstone, Behr& Lazarus
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Two Dominant Political Parties of the United States of America for FREE!