It is a common saying that sometimes what appears so obvious is not exactly the same as it is usually projected. The same is the case with the political climate of America. It is a common thought that the Americans are divided to the opposite extremes so far as the political issues of the nations are concerned…
Rather, these are the political leaders who are that much at the extremes, the public is generally moderate, asserted by the Author.
The author, throughout the book, is continuously trying to assert the same that the Americans are actually not at extremes, they are moderate. In explaining so, he has used the data regarding the opinions of the American citizens over various national issues, such as homosexuality, abortion, religious as well as the economic affairs of the state. The data provided by the author is mainly taken from national electoral and opinion polls and the facts and figures as old as 1972. The data is even older in some issues. Thus, the nature of the data provided by the author is quite authentic and relevant.
In the start, the author is taking into account the commonly thought axiom of the cultural war. This assumption explains that there are two extremes of the cultural war within Americans. On one side, there are the conservatives, supported by the red states. While, on the other hand, there are blue states which back the liberals. This assumption is made on the basis of the voting history of these states. However, he presents the facts and figures of the 2000 elections and the revelation is quite astonishing that on the contrary to the abovementioned common belief, most of the voters in both, blue and red states, are more towards the independents, thus more moderates in number, than the conservatives or the democrats. He further drills down into the preferences of the voters on various national issues, he found that not all the red state citizens are on one extreme nor all blue ones on another, rather there are more moderates and the gentry is mixed.
To reinforce his view, the author has taken into account the issue of abortion in a detailed manner. He argues that most Americans have a moderate approach. These are the journalists and the politicians who are at extreme or who project so. He has analyzed the opinions of the people taken in 1973 during the Roe v. Wade ruling, the event when the issue of abortion found its way into the political landscape at the national level. He has then compared the public opinion on the same issue 30 years later and he concludes that most of the public is moderate about the opinion 30 years back and is so even today, thus the moderate approach existed since the very beginning and is not something that has changes, rather it exist even today.
Besides abortions, the author has also taken into account another political issue that has got a lot of prominence at the national political scenario. This is the issue of homosexuality and the homosexual rights. He asserts, on the basis of the data, that same as abortion, most of the Americans agrees to some extent regarding the issue and more people are at moderate level on the continuum of extremity and it is media as well as the political elites that make these issues a hype so as to make the people realize that the public opinion is deeply divided on the issue and use this perception for their political motives.
The author has also evaluated that manner in which the voters determine whom to vote and trend of changes in these decisions. It is generally thought in America that recently the religion plays a greater role in determining the voters' ...
Cite this document
(“American Politics Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/304990-american-politics-book-reportreview
(American Politics Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“American Politics Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/304990-american-politics-book-reportreview.
Mrs. Trollope wrote about the "Domestic Manners of the Americans" and how Americans were distinguished in their egalitarian values, though these appeared to her as a lack in refinement. Mrs. Kemble wrote about the slavery in the South - a sharp contrast to the liberty and equality displayed in the Northern States.
Perhaps it is the unsurpassed drama and focus on such opinionated viewpoints and events that surround a presidential election that captures the interest of almost every American.
The theory of the predictable campaign is discussed in Chapter 2. Presidential campaign courses are predictable, according to this chapter.
The second strategy is an unconscious one in which a decision is reached very quickly and usually without any awareness that a decision was even made. The second type are more popularly referred to as either gut decisions or hunches and it is the expansion and dependability of them that Malcolm Gladwell addresses in his book Blink.
Defining the precise legal status of these lands is complicated by the fact that, over the years, the United States government has treated these lands inconsistently; indeed, as noted by the author, these lands have at different times been allotted individually and then been reorganized as collectively owned lands.
Climate change is increasingly framed as an issue where the threats are severe, increasingly imminent and potentially catastrophic. If the worst predictions of scientists prove to be accurate, then no one will be able to escape the consequences of climate change.
appears to illumine the darkest side of American politics. Recent glimpses into the outrageous lying of the bureaucratic upper echelons makes it clear that abusing power and deluding the public have become the order in most recent administrations.
Albuquerque Tribune reporter Eileen Welsome, who won the Pulitzer Prize for national reporting on April 12, 1994, uncovered most of what the public knows about the plutonium experiments.
Zinn takes a decidedly left leaning approach in his analysis of events, whilst Carnes presents a more functional perspective. Tending to see the uprising and subsequent civil war as the necessary progression from the turbulent political and social times. Such contrasting analysis of the same events by different historians gives multifaceted insight into the national psyche during the civil war.
It is typically used in the study of small communities, gangs, total institutions, informal groups and other small scale settings. The research techniques employed include informal interviewing of participants and of informants (selected individuals who provide detailed interpretations of the setting being observed), participation of the researcher in the activities being studied, and observation of key events in the life of the collectivity.
The concept implies that a place is more than a physical location: it has also an essence which is sometimes personified in folk tales, by such creatures as faeries, gnomes or other fantastic creatures. At the core of this concept lies the important idea that places are somewhat like people, and therefore, can be suggested to possess similar traits to people.