Majority rule is a means for organizing government and deciding public issues", according to the United States of America International Information (http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/principles/majority.htm. ret: 4/21/08).
Practically, this is another route to liberty which may mean that not a single person or organized institution is given the prerogative to neither be dominant over the others nor cart off the rights of self-determination as well as its inherent privileges…
(http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/principles/majority.htm. ret: 4/21/08).
The relationship between the two is that the principles of majority rule and minority rights identically support an egalitarian form of government in the United States of America. An example to this is the "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which make illegal employment discrimination on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It applies to all colleges and universities, public or private that have at least fifteen employees. The U.S. Constitution prohibits state employment in violation of the equal protection of the laws, and applies to all public institutions of higher education. Title VII and the Constitution jointly establish what is required and permitted with respect to affirmative action in higher education" (The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1964).
Another example which exhibits the duality of the constitution is the No Child Left Behind Act of the NCLB, a constitutional provision ensuring the right of all children to be studying in school (Henley, Mcbride, Milligan, and Nichols, 2007). ...
Cite this document
(“Majority Rule and Minority Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/306315-majority-rule-and-minority-rights-essay
(Majority Rule and Minority Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Majority Rule and Minority Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/306315-majority-rule-and-minority-rights-essay.
The exposure of students to the content of the books did not amount to compelling them to adhere to the religious views presented. By a mere requirement that the students should read from the series of Holt books, it did not amount to indoctrination or the promotion of the religious views presented by the books (Suber, 1987).
Majority rule is a competitive method that consensus does not agree with in its general structure. Consensus creates a form of cooperation than competition in voting. The majority rule is however important when dealing with technical matters that require knowledge on the subject of debate.
Dr. Herman H.H. van Erp (1999) claims that democracy must "legitimize itself by an appeal to some conception of the common good and not by majority interests. Nevertheless, it requires an implementation of the common good through some kind of majority rule"2.
Basically, law is contextual; as it is embedded in practice and institution, and takes its substance from existing patterns of human demeanor and relations (Jefferson Powell, 1993). To an equal degree, law is influential, meant to proceed the human good of those it serves, hence subject to variation to achieve this end.
The clear trend has been to favor the sanctity of individual liberties over the preservation of traditionalist and vanguardist policies. As stated by O'Donnell (2004): "a truly democratic rule of law ensures political rights, civil liberties, and mechanisms of accountability which in turn affirms the political equality of all citizens and constrain political abuses of state power." (p.32)
We are deceived if we think that the passion for human rights is the inevitable wave of the future or that it will be carried by the spirit of the times. Today there is a growing debate about whether the idea of human rights holds any significance to regimes when it comes in standing conflict with their policies or with their political or economic endeavours.
Madison asserts, "The prescriptions in favor of liberty ought to be levelled against that quarter where the greatest danger lies, namely, that which possesses the highest prerogative of power. But this is not found in either the Executive or Legislative departments of Government, but in the body of the people, operating by the majority against the minority" (par.
Indeed, there are several places in the Constitution where suspicion of unchecked majority power is evident - from the Bill of Rights to the structure of the Senate to the Electoral College. To be sure, some historical events that ran relatively concurrent with the birth of the United States, primarily the French Revolution and its associated "Reign of Terror," provided ample illustration of the potential for majority rule to degenerate into mob rule.
, the various approaches later on have recognized this view to be inappropriate and recognized the need to benefit consumers, employees and the community .Moreover, it has been well recognized that the shareholders interest need to be well regarded and the corporation’s
Douglass becomes miserable because of having full awareness of his wretched conditions. As a slave, he is not a human being. He has no freedoms and rights. His master controls his life, even the lives of his children. Therefore, he is more like a beast with no identity and future than an individual with a deeper purpose in life.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Majority Rule and Minority Rights Essay for FREE!