Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

David A. Sklansky's view of Katz v. United States - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Undergraduate
Essay
Miscellaneous
Pages 3 (753 words)

Summary

The aim of this work is to understand, why the case of Katz v. United States is still important for the legal practice, especially from the viewpoint of the security threats existing after the events of 9/11, and why Sklansky in his article 'Katz v. United States: The Limits of Aphorism' states that this is one of the most important and universal Fourth Amendment cases ever decided…

Extract of sample
David A. Sklansky's view of Katz v. United States

(Sklansky, 2006) According to the author, Katz case remains a landmark both because it provides the constitutional framework that continues to govern electronic surveillance, and because it provides the modern test for a 'search' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.
The Fourth Amendment has been the cornerstone in many legal cases for the limits to which the privacy of the person can be breached for the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases. However, the case itself remains rather ambiguous, and there is still doubt, whether taking into account the modern situation after the events of 9/11 electronic surveillance and eavesdropping should be allowed without a warrant Some suppose that the judicial decisions made by Burger and Rehnquist may diminish the effect of Katz's case. It is possible to have a look at least one of the cases ruled by these justices in relation to the Fourth amendment:
'Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

LAW CASE (sheapard v. united states)
In 1933 Major Shepard files a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. A Writ of Certiorari is a document in which the losing party files with the Supreme Court asking them to review the case from a lower court (Techlaw Journal, 2008). This can be done when the petitioner is dissatisfied with the decisions of the lower courts including the US Court of Appeals. A Writ can be granted at the discretion of the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court being the highest Court in the Nation has the right to not accept the petition and there has to be some kind of compelling reason for acceptance. In Shepards…
2 pages (502 words)
The article Miranda Revisted: Dickerson v. United States by Thomas Petrowski
The author provides the factors under which the confession is considered to be voluntary. The section of passage 3501 is used to protect the rights of convicts, however, despite of this passage the law enforcement agencies followed the ruling in Miranda.…
2 pages (502 words)
A History of Consumerism In The United States
According to Professor Peter Stearns at George Mason University a reasonable shorthand definition of modern consumerism can be given stressing two distinct features: "1) a serious commitment to the acquisition, display, and enjoyment of goods and commercial services clearly not necessary to subsistence however generously defined, and 2) participation in the process by social groups outside the upper classes." (Stearns 2003, para. 5). These definitions are very important to consider as they shed light upon the use of the term "consumerism" in the present essay about the history of consumerism…
6 pages (1506 words)
The United States Supreme Court
In this analysis, this is a strong majority opinion and probably not subject to change in the future. Sections 506(a) and 506(d) deal with independent legal issues, the language of 506(a) may not be used to invoke the lien avoiding language of 506(d), and debtors must suffer the burden of such disparities between the value of the underlying collateral and the debt itself. The Court’s holding, it must be noted, was not unanimous. Two Justices, Scalia and Souter, dissented. The dissenting opinion argued that sections 506(a) and 506(d) ought to have been read as complementary sections, that…
2 pages (502 words)