For a project to be successful, it is imperative that its goals are clearly defined and communicated in the entire working environment to achieve them within budget, within schedule and with a good quality.
One scenario where the project was not clearly aligned with business goals was in an implementation of a new CRM system in the organization for the first time…
The firm sold industry equipment through personal contacts and personal relationships of the top end staff. When the CRM system was decided to be licensed, there were huge arguments about its necessity since such a system would not be suited for selling industry equipment. However the decision was made by the high-ups and the license was bought. The implementation of this system was not as successful as was expected because there was no alignment between the business objectives and the technological objectives. The results the top-end of the management wanted to achieve could only be achieved up to 50% and the huge investment became a waste. If a more customized and industry usable system had been purchased like a Supply Chain System or an Enterprise Resource Plan, then the results would have been much better. (Jessup & Valacich, 2007)
The project aimed at involving the industry clients to communicate through the CRM system with the organization telling them about the quantity they want to purchase, any customizations they require and the time of delivery etc. Orders from the clients came in bulk and were quite infrequent. Managing these orders had been easy in the past and it was being manually without any problems. Since no boom in the industry was expected, this project was also considered as not being able to utilize its full potential.
The problem in this case was the poor judgment of the scenario at hand by the top management. They wanted to automate the ordering and delivery systems however the technological side of the CRM could do much more than automating these two functions. The Microsoft Dynamics CRM 3.0 was also able to maximize the marketing capabilities of the organization. In this case, marketing wasn't the objective and no one had ever thought about marketing the industry equipment into a brand name. The company had never put up nay ads and didn't even have a marketing department. (Microsoft, 2008)
The CRM 3.0 also helps to improve the customer relationships with the clients. The company got business from personal contacts and generating goodwill and relationships wasn't really a problem. Therefore this objective from the technology side of the new system was also negated. (Microsoft, 2008)
Lastly the CRM system empowered the users for the entire sales cycles. In some sense this was the only objective the organization wanted to achieve from the new system. However this module was also sparingly used by the organization due to infrequent orders. (Microsoft, 2008)
The project should have been aligned with the objectives the organization was trying to achieve only then the IT team should have been involved to give ideas to suggest a solution for the problem at hand. In this case the IT department would most probably have suggested that the current business model of manual work was best until more business was acquired. The problem that we see here is not with the implementation of the project, rather with the thinking of the high-end managers. (Morgan, 2002)
According to Livingston (2004), one of the drivers for mismanagement and misalignment of organizational goals to technological goals is the varying view of business executives on the role or affects that IT integration could have on their companies. In this case the executives were thinking that profound results would be ...
Cite this document
(“Project Management Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/308218-project-management-case-study
(Project Management Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Project Management Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/308218-project-management-case-study.
A mixture of significant funding together with extremely inefficient project management, and technical difficulties led to claims of unwarranted expenses, exaggerated expenses, and sloppy work. All these issues played a part in the speedy deterioration in the attitude of federal administration toward continuing with the project and consequently, the failure of the project.
As aptly illustrated by The Economist in the case of ET Water Systems’ it can be noted that transport costs are playing a big part in reshoring. For instance, rising shipping, rail and road costs impact negatively on companies that make goods with relatively low “value-density”, such as consumer goods since the transport costs to ship them will be high such that they cannot be offset by the revenue generated.
Unless tackled, these uncertainties can lead to a major project disaster. The uncertainties encountered during project execution are the potential project risks. Risk can be defined as the possibility of loss. Risk arises due to the inability to achieve objectives within defined cost, schedule and technical constraints.
Information on likely activity durations, cost and necessary sequences are the key factors that are useful in Network analysis. By determining critical activities, clarifying responsibility and improving control, network analysis and critical path method are helpful to identify and eliminate bottlenecks in a project.
ng transport costs for operating in China or other parts of Asia impact on business, high labour costs are now also being experienced in countries that formerly had low labour costs and labour costs are also falling in Canada since there are less powerful unions.
The department of defense had realized that it was time to adopt modern technology, and whatever approach to project management that was adopted would have to be able to deliver high quality success within the given time frame and
The customers to this company are banks, assurance firms and other theory companies. Therefore, the stakeholders that define XYZ Company are all the people that directly or indirectly benefit from the operations of this company.
In this esteem, Hillary distinctive capability functions much like a key achievement component. Hillary cross-porting scheme is one well famous demonstration of how a unique capability of individuals led to an exceptional distinctive