Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Freedom of Media - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
High school
Essay
Miscellaneous
Pages 5 (1255 words)

Summary

BACKGROUND: The Human Rights Act means all public authorities must ensure that everything they do is compatible with the Convention Rights unless an Act of Parliament makes that impossible. The 1950 Convention, which followed the earlier Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1948, seeks to give all citizens in Europe certain essential rights and fundamental freedoms…

Extract of sample
Freedom of Media

And the Act gives people a clear legal statement of their basic rights and fundamental freedoms. The key principle of the Act is that wherever possible there should be compatibility with the Convention rights.
SECTION 10 CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT 1981: The section 10 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 has given some formal recognition to the media's watchdog role, in relation to the protection of journalists sources. It says:
"No court may require a person to disclose, nor is a person guilty of contempt of court for refusing to disclose the source of information contained in the publication for which he is responsible; unless it be established to the satisfaction of the court that disclosure is necessary in the interests of justice or national security or for the prevention of disorder or crime".
This section covers any speech, writing, broadcast or other communication made or addressed to the public. Although journalists take advantage of this section mostly, it is not confined to journalists only. It offers protection for the disclosure of any material, or information directly or indirectly disclosing, or likely to facilitate the disclosure of source's identity. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Freedom of Speech
Because freedom of speech carries such importance, it also carries the danger of being misused. People use speech to cause other people pain, and for their own personal gain. Media often takes their freedoms too far, impinging on the private lives of civilians. Despite these problems, speech must be protected. By look at the arguments made by Charles R. Lawrence in his essay "On Racist Speech" and by Susan Jacoby in "A First Amendment Junkie," the reader is clearly drawn to the conclusion that, while speech can be misused, all speech must continue to be protected, since any limitations could…
3 pages (753 words)