It is absolutely true. Millions of people from all over the world come to America to be certain that they have found a land where finally they would have enough of everything.
However, America is also a country…
The September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center prove the universality of the statement that nothing in this world is fireproof. Nothing, and absolutely nothing – is completely free from unprecedented terror. Today, the United States will vouch for that, as Washington has taken all possible damage-control measures to ensure that its people breathe easy. However, unforgettable times can never be erased completely – they can just remain hidden.
While the attack on the WTC on September 11 woke America from its complacency, what followed the attack is nothing short of incredulous. The attack affected not just Americans, but also those “millions of people” all around the world who had depended on America for a better life. Consequently, Washington had to answer its citizens – all of them. The visible damage control measures involved a steady deal of deliberation, a great deal of communication, and a massive amount of persuasion. America’s communication arsenal was put to the finest test – as the country had to answer to visibly all related parties – from citizens to trade partners. The damage was done – when two architectural marvels were torn down – but the damage control required America to sharpen its most potent weapon, and unarguably, the most required weapon – communication.
Indeed, intelligent and thoughtful political communication techniques were the only tools that could bail America out of distress. If communication techniques were not up to the mark, America would have lost millions in terms of investment, damage to property, and loss of life. If today, America is again on its feet, it is all thanks to the marvelous communication techniques employed in those times of distress.
So, in this research paper, we will attempt to look at the communication angle with respect to 9/11 attack closely. The impact of 9/11 was felt all around the world, and America has so far done a fine job in ...
Cite this document
(“Puplic Opinion and Political Communication - International Political Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/322211-puplic-opinion-and-political-communication-international-political-communication
(Puplic Opinion and Political Communication - International Political Essay)
“Puplic Opinion and Political Communication - International Political Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/322211-puplic-opinion-and-political-communication-international-political-communication.
The present essay explores the importance of communication in the political world by comparing the modern trend in technology specifically the internet to previous traditional communication. Although analysts have observed that communication techniques have changed, political influence impregnated into community tends to bear similar consequences observed in previous time.
Therefore, it can be deciphered from the above explanation of the concept that political communication is considered very necessary in the modern world. Thus, an effective and positive political message or message about a particular country will help reflect the current one, can further enhance its international reputation as well (McNair, 2011).
Gone are the ages of closed door military meetings, secret missions, and blind attacks; all of which are afforded by a privacy that no longer exists. Satellites, imbedded reporters, and twenty-four hour news coverage have elevated communication to a massive tool in wartime.
It has become our electronic social hall and has also developed into our electronic town meeting. Traditional political debate and decisions have been absorbed by the ever-expanding forums of call-in radio and late-night variety shows." Sometimes, politicians have the same credentials and track records.
However, one-to-one communication means that it is unilateral in which a message is sent and received. In a larger scale of teams, messages can be lost and misconstrued which may be detrimental to the dynamics of the group. Individuals may feel intimidated, pressured, and not as open when discussing the idea in a team environment.
The open publishing arrangement worked significantly over time especially for the stories developed top cover in due time. The onset of flame wars, excessive advertising, and racist commentary rendered the IMC a liability to mainstream media.