Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample

urts have unlimited resources at their disposal to build a case against a defendant or respondent, whereas a respondent has only their own resources to rely upon. In some cases the opponents in a case are allowed the opportunity to present their case to a jury. In other instances the opposing parties must rely on a judge only to decide the truthfulness of each side.
To understand the adversarial system of justice, one must notice the distinctions between the types of judicial systems in practice today. “Let us start with the classical distinction between adversarial and inquisitorial systems of criminal justice. The usual way of describing the former is as a contest between two equal parties, seeking to resolve a dispute before a passive and impartial judge, with a jury (the people) pronouncing one version of events to be the truth.” (Fennell, Harding, Jorg & Swart, 1995). Where there are two parties interested in the truthfulness of an issue, fairness may be compromised when the interests of either party are at stake. The adversarial process incorporates just that. “But this places inordinate faith in the notion that partisan manipulation of evidentiary materials, even under equality of arms, can put an independent judge in a position to determine truth--an assumption at best unproven, and at worst highly implausible. Add to this anxieties about the capacity of procedural rules to ensure equality of the parties, and the relationship between procedural fairness, truth, and legitimacy becomes more difficult.” (Fennell, Harding, Jorg & Swart, 1995).
In English criminal courts of first instance, the Justice of the Peace or Stipendiary Magistrate decide cases without a jury. “The chief function of these officials is to try relatively minor criminal offenses, although they do have jurisdiction in certain domestic relations -- matrimonial, bastardy, and rate cases, and a few administrative functions -- and, as indicated, determine whether there is sufficient ...
Download paper


To what extent they are fair or just simply depend on the players, the judges and the set up of legal principles applied. There are opposing sides to any judicial proceeding which requires an overseer to maintain fair play in the…
Author : maddisonwyman

Related Essays

Law - legal systems
The expansion of the role of government in the lives of its citizens has brought with it an increasing number of controversies between citizen and state. There is a perception too that as a people we have become more litigious. All this has resulted in an increase in litigation, aggravating the problems within the current judicial structure, causing delays from the ensuing backlog of cases, higher costs to the parties and the taxpayer, the bureaucratization of dispute-processing systems and exaggeration of minor disputes as a result of regulations, delays and costs. Furthermore, both court...
8 pages (2008 words) Essay
comparative police systems
ther country and while arguing the extent to which they do so is beyond the scope of the present research, the research shall, nevertheless establish this to be the case with reference to surveillance. Through a comparative analysis of the post 9/11 right to surveillance granted to either of the two states, this paper shall demonstrate that even though the USA constitutes a more critical case than the UK, the right and expectation to privacy in both countries has been critically undermined....
2 pages (502 words) Essay
comparative economic systems
With industrialization came the need for a skilled and diverse workforce where traditional work arrangements were no longer feasible. During the Cold War period the world was divided into two main camps with the West (USA, W. Europe) embracing a...
10 pages (2510 words) Essay
Comparative Legal System
Promissory estoppel brings principles of fairness and equity into the equation for the first time and lowers the bar to allow more informal arrangements to have force of law. While it would an overstatement to say that estoppel undermines common law rules of consideration—because courts have discretion whether to apply the doctrine or not—it certainly alters the significance of consideration in contract-making....
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Comparative Economic Systems
While proponents of this global economic model argue that this is the best possible system, there are also those who strongly oppose various aspects of this system. Taking a historical perspective, we see that the events of the two centuries are shaped and defined by the practice of capitalism. In a way, the peaking of European colonialism coincided with the consolidation of capitalist economic theory, which ultimately replaced it. In other words, the power and influence wielded by large multinational corporations today (which are the façade of global capitalism) is nothing short of a variant...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Comparative criminal justice systems
This has inspired innovation but it has also led people to try illegal ways of getting money. The gaige kaifang (literally means opening up and reforms) policy has also invited new types of crime to the Chinese society from other places including the west. Advancement in the legal system in China was backtracked by several factors including the cold war, world war two, and the disruptive political campaigns that followed after that. Real reform began in 1970 when legal institutions began to be formed (Gelatt, 2001)....
1 pages (251 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!