Argumentative Essay (Comparison between Gregory Stock and Francis Fukuyama)

Ph.D.
Essay
Miscellaneous
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
Bioengineering of the human race came to be an object of strong discussion recently because of the developments in technology that we experience today. Bioengineering means manipulation of the genes in order to get a desired individual. This manipulation can be done through…

Introduction

There are two viewpoints regarding this subject, one of then is that bioengineering is bad and will have negative consequences, viewpoint shared by Francis Fukuyama. The second viewpoint is that bioengineering will bring good results to all humans and will have positive consequences, viewpoint shared by Gregory Stock.
Francis Fukuyama does not support the bioengineering of humans because he thinks that we should respect natural selection. Natural selection is so perfect that have created connections between our genes that we cant even start to realize. This connections reflects also in our functioning within the ecosystems. How can we start bioengineering humans if we still not fully understand the functioning of mother nature?
Though we are cultural individuals, bioengineering would alter one way or another who we are. This would create strong social, and governmental changes. The risks are unpredictable. For Fukuyama bioengineering can even be co-related to the Germans Nazi activity.
For Gregory Stock bioengineering cant be stopped because people will demand to have the advantages of such technology. For Stocks it can not be banned because someone somewhere will develop it, so it should be done in the U.S. because it is a country with good ethics.
For Stocks the development of this technology will reduce the incidence of diseases, retard the aging effect, bring the possibility for the parents to “design” their childs physical and mental characteristics like the color of the eyes or the degree of intelligence of the child for example. The works of nature by trial and error can be very cruel, so, of course everyone will see bioengineering of humans as a beneficial technology that everyone will what to have access to.
He disagrees with Stock about the parents being able to take such decision about their childes, and if theres anyone to regulate such choices it should be the state. Fukuyama gives two utilitarian reasons on why the ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Francis Fukuyama' s idea of "human dignity"
The author is popular for his statements on biotechnology and human dignity more than a decade ago that, because the other possibilities to liberal egalitarianism had pushed themselves, history as we knew it was at a conclusion. …
Stock Market Essay
When it comes to the analysis of other factors, it becomes imperative for me to delve into the political and economic factors of Hong Kong in 1993 and Singapore in 1989.…
Stock Market Master Essay
For a while if we go into the history of stock exchange then, it is to be noted that, it was 11th century in France where the courtiers de change were concerned with maintaining the debts of agricultural communities on behalf of banks. These men could be termed as first brokers. Basic roles of stock exchanges can be outlined as below:…
Argumentative Essay (Comparison between Gregory Stock and Francis Fukuyama)
There are two viewpoints regarding this subject, one of then is that bioengineering is bad and will have negative consequences, viewpoint shared by Francis Fukuyama. The second viewpoint is that bioengineering will bring good results to all humans and will have positive consequences, viewpoint shared by Gregory Stock.…
argumentative essay about rationale
Exegesis is written on religious Scripture like the New Testament. In short, exegesis is an inquiry into the meaning of historical facts written in scriptures. Exegesis includes the two aspects of what the author said and why the author said during that time. Hence, exegesis deals with the intention of a written piece of work. Exegesis is also written to know about the primary reader’s response…
write an argumentative essay
However, choosing organic foods is not a way to entirely avoid dangerous foods. Because of poor industry regulations and standards, the booming organic food business is not, in fact, producing products that are superior to its conventional counterparts, therefore causing organic food to be no better for consumer health than other food types.…
Argumentative Essay - Pregnant Teenagers
Thesis statement: The innovative measures like sex education, involvement of the parents, solving family problems and emotional problems, counseling and awareness programs can save teenagers from the social problem of teenage pregnancy.…