• Home
  • Subjects
  • Miscellaneous
  • Neither the European Courts nor the Land registration Act 2002 have come to the rescue of landowners who sleep whilst others use their land: land theft by adverse possession is still a reality.

Neither the European Courts nor the Land registration Act 2002 have come to the rescue of landowners who sleep whilst others use their land: land theft by adverse possession is still a reality. - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Neither the European Courts nor the Land registration Act 2002 have come to the rescue of landowners who sleep whilst others use their land: land theft by adverse possession is still a reality.

tudy will be the following one: The general provisions of the Statutes (LRA 1925 and LRA 2002) will be presented primarily – especially their provisions for the adverse law possession. At a next section the particular aspects of JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom) will be presented trying to identify the elements the case that can be used in order to support the position of landowners that are in danger of loosing their land through adverse possession. Finally, the literature that has been published on the particular issue will be developed trying to aligning the assumptions that are stated in the theory with the existed law suggesting changes where the relevant legal orders are not clear or where additional provisions need to be incorporated in current legal orders that regulate the adverse law possession. In other words, the research will be a qualitative one – no data to be involved – while the comparison of the existed legal provisions is considered as necessary in order to formulate a valid assumption on the issue under examination.
In order to understand the law of adverse possession in relation with the land law, we should primarily refer to the specific term as it is used within the relevant legal texts in order to represent the acquisition of land with no legal title. In this context, it is stated that ‘adverse possession is the process by which a "squatter" becomes the legal owner of land by possessing it for a certain period of time, thereby dispossessing the "paper" owner of his title’ (Mace and Jones, 2007). The law of adverse possession has been differentiated through the years under the influence of changes in the legal and social context of Britain. It should be noticed that ‘prior to 2003, a squatter could obtain adverse possession if he demonstrated uninterrupted factual possession of the land and an intention to possess the land for a period of 12 years; however under the 2002 Act, the period of time a squatter is required to be in ...Show more

Summary

Both the statutes and the case law are going to be analytically examined and evaluated in accordance with their relevance with the…
Author : meghan94
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Neither the European Courts nor the Land registration Act 2002 have come to the rescue of landowners who sleep whilst others use their land: land theft by adverse possession is still a reality."
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Land Use & Religion
The RLUIPA was enacted to prevent zoning codes and land marking laws from discriminating against religious assemblies, while considering permission for the assembly of people for religious assemblies, or the zoning board or land marking commission from discriminating against religious assemblies, while taking their decisions on granting permission for religious assemblies.
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Land law
The phrase adverse possession developed around the concept of a trespasser or squatter peacefully occupying property in a manner which was essentially inconsistent
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
"The changes made by the Land Registration Act 2002 are likely to be more far-reaching than the great reforms of property law that were made by the 1925 legisla
ase for registration was 21 years, but the new Act requires that seven year leases must be registered, thereby impacting businesses where lease terms are set up under the provisions of the old Act. Under the old law, every person in actual occupation could claim an overriding
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
LAND LAW
between the years 1956 to1973. The Registered owner of the land was a civil servant, McFarlane. (Farlane 1977). In fact, in 1954, Powell had sought permission by way of a letter to the actual owner, McFarlane, seeking
15 pages (3750 words) Essay
To what extent does the orthodox interpretation of proprietary estoppel in situations where third party interests are affected accord with principle? Has the Land Registration Act 2002 brought coherence to this troubled area of law?
Unlike other estoppels, proprietary estoppel goes further and can be utilised as a tool to enforce or grant a property right de facto.3 However, whilst the equitable justification for
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Outline and critically examine the procedural and substantive changes in the law on land registration brought about by the Land Registration Act 2002. Is land r
sserted the overriding purpose of the LRA 2002 being the implementation of a novel framework of land registration, which would in turn demonstrate a more complete and up to date state of title and that “unregistered land has had its day”2. To this end, it has been propounded
14 pages (3500 words) Essay
The law relating to adverse possession has been fundamentally changed by the Land Registration Act 2002. Critically evaluate this statement with reference to the justifications for changes to this area of the law.
Possession of the land must have been peaceable and open, and the land must have been exclusively used by the person claiming possession of the land. Cockburn LJ in
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Find out how much would it cost
to get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT