StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu
  • Home
  • Subjects
  • Miscellaneous
  • Jurisprudence - Paternalism protects people from themselves. Limiting liberty can only be justified to prevent harm to other people, not to prevent self-harm (JS Mill). Which acts should be criminalised and which acts are none of the state's business

Jurisprudence - Paternalism protects people from themselves. Limiting liberty can only be justified to prevent harm to other people, not to prevent self-harm (JS Mill). Which acts should be criminalised and which acts are none of the state's business - Essay Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
Jurisprudence - Paternalism protects people from themselves. Limiting liberty can only be justified to prevent harm to other people, not to prevent self-harm (JS Mill). Which acts should be criminalised and which acts are none of the state's business

Others argue that the criminalisation of some private and ‘harmless’ acts makes paternalism a hindrance to liberty and thus, it should be used sparingly or not at all utilised. Some scholars contend that the context and nuances of ‘harmful’ and ‘harmless’ are too broad and must be properly defined. Still, questions remain with regards which acts the state should criminalise and acts which the state should consider private and harmless. This paper will maintain Mill’s argument that acts which evidently harm others should be criminalised. It will further argue that consensual acts in which consent lacks validity should also fall under the scope of the law and the control of private and ‘harmless’ behaviours fall beyond the aforementioned categories and is none of the state’s business. However, the criminalisation of these acts, as Mill had argued, should not be meant to unnecessarily augment the power of the state.
In his work ‘On Liberty,’ John Stuart Mill brought forth the most compelling clarification on the distinction between liberalism and paternalism. He argues that ‘the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised’ over citizens, against their volition ‘is to prevent harm to others’ adding that ‘the individual is sovereign’ over himself (Mill, 24 ). However, Mill’s ‘harm principle’ has come under attacks - the most prominent of which was put forth by Arthur Ripstein. Ripstein argues that Mill’s harm principle should be abandoned as he brings forward the notion of ‘equal freedom,’ an idea derivative of Kant’s and which he believes afford the more ‘legitimate basis for criminalisation’ (Ripstein 216-219). For Ripstein, Mill’s principles fell in short in scope as it failed to include considerable ‘class’ of ‘violations’ that do not necessitate criminalisation or prohibition. He ...Show more

Summary

Although many view paternalism as a curtailment of liberty, many also view it as a form of protection from the harms that human beings are capable of inflicting on another. John Stuart Mill, although opposes…
Author : erichkunde
Jurisprudence - Paternalism protects people from themselves. Limiting liberty can only be justified to prevent harm to other people, not to prevent self-harm (JS Mill). Which acts should be criminalised and which acts are none of the states business essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Jurisprudence - Paternalism protects people from themselves. Limiting liberty can only be justified to prevent harm to other people, not to prevent self-harm (JS Mill). Which acts should be criminalised and which acts are none of the state's business"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

The Essence of a Deliberate Self-Harm
I found that patients of self-harm are, at times, perceived negatively by the nurses particularly those in the A&E (Accidents and Emergency) departments. The nurses believed that the patients of self-harm are attention-seekers and do not need any immediate care.
15 pages (3750 words) Essay
JS MILL ON LIBERTY ASSIGNMENT
John Stuart Mills outlined the Harm Principle in his essay, On Liberty. This principle stated, “The sole end for which mankind is warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection.
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Does Media Violence actually cause people to Commit Violent Acts
According to the American Psychological Association, watching and playing violent scenes on games and television, can desensitize children to the misery and suffering of others and may be a greater risk of acting aggressively toward others and they're less bothered by violence in general and less likely to see anything wrong with it.
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Self harm in adolescents
The adolescents have challenges as they grow. They struggle to overcome stress that is accumulated from school, peer groups and family. Some result in self-harm. Self-harm involves hurting oneself by burning, taking unsafe substances, cutting the body, pulling the hair and piercing the body.
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Self-Harm in Adolescence
Most of those who engage in self-harm are young people and they do so by stopping short of killing themselves, which makes this particular behavior distinct from suicide. Unlike suicide, whose motivations have been long understood by experts as utter hopelessness and despair, there is no easy way to explain the psychodynamic of self-harm.
12 pages (3000 words) Essay
Paternalism
However, problems with regards this 'slight' paternalism arise as it involves the imposition of punishments on some private actions - actions which for many do not pose harm or should they be harms, these are merely inflicted on oneself. Others argue that the criminalisation of some private and 'harmless' acts makes paternalism a hindrance to liberty and thus, it should be used sparingly or not at all utilised.
7 pages (1750 words) Essay
John Stuart Mills Harm Principle
Mill, the prevention of harm is commonly thought to delimit the extent of permissible political interference with a person's liberty1. This view is put forward in his famous harm principle, the principle that, ". the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others." The problem with applying Mill's principle is determining what is to count as a harm1.
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Self Harm
Self harm usually happens when one cuts, abuses the usage of drugs or other substances such as alcohol, punches, hits, tears, scratches, chokes, bites, burns one's own self or inhales harmful or toxic substances. The habit of self harming grows with time.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Self-Harm in Prisoners
Some argue that the courts usually concentrate on the fact that criminals could have committed the crimes without motive rather that basing judgment on the types of the crimes that are committed. This is true in most cases since the establishment of the courts also had in mind that felons could be corrected, guided and counselled and hence focused on this more that taking punitive measures.
11 pages (2750 words) Essay
Psychiatry, self harm risk
So many people all around the world are developing mental problems like depression and anxiety, and one of the symptoms or apparent "solution" to their problems is self harm. Either they
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation