Second Amendment Rights - Essay Example

tatement of the Second Amendment of Right to Bear Arms could be considered both general and quite unstable as to saying who is allowed and is not allowed to own a gun. Apparently, the word “militia” in the context of the released law does not only refer to the federal officials but to anyone who has been trained to handle a gun. In some cases, the explanation of a “militia” even refers to a community of “reserved soldiers”.1 These reserved soldiers are members of the community considered as individuals who are ready to fight for the country in case emergency national needs require them to be a part of the country’s defence.

2This is of course a matter of serious consideration; however, noting who these reserves may be has not been specifically stated in the law created about gun ownership guidelines. Apparently, the unstated guideline as to who exactly are plainly allowed to own a gun around the 49 states of America made the Second Amendment rather debatable. Believably, it is through this particular loop hole in this particular law that the owners of guns who are less responsible are able to live away from the seriousness of what they have done despite the fact that somehow, they may have created certain differential analogy of the second amendment giving them quite an easier option of running away from the punishment that they ought to receive in connection with the law in concern.

As an upper tier law, the second amendment of rights in the United States gave an allowable bearing upon those who have their own guns as a measure of self defence and response to possible national security threats.3 Although the law allowed even ordinary people to own their arms, they must still be able to register their possessions in an agreeable matter written on paper that they are to use the guns only when necessary such as situations when their safety is under threat or if the national security commission ordered them to be a part of the civilian soldiers as