This helps to reduce the constraints that arise from cultural diversity that makes it difficult to penetrate the international market. With a common language, it becomes easy to negotiate deals and share ideas due to the fact that communication is an important factor that enhances understanding and resolving of conflicts. International organizations, for example United Nations which incorporates personnel from various ethnic back grounds and also exercises its mandate across various geographical regions, could have a hard time in trying to manage their human resources (Knight 2003).
This is because there would have to be intermediaries or interpreters to assist in passing and translating information. However, the UN promotes and respects multilingualism through its agenda item 114 of the General Assembly and as such, it tries hard to communicate to the different communities through their native languages which is believed to promote cohesiveness and positive attitude towards the operations of the organization (Knight 2003). However, due to the dominance of the English language over the other languages, most of the communication whether in the print or electronic media is mostly done in English. This essay is a critical evaluation of the costs and benefits of English as the dominant language in most of the international organizations.
The use of English in international organizations has had both limitations and benefits to these organizations. Multilingualism and cultural diversity are among the various factors that determine the success of international corporations as well as business enterprises that have subsidiaries across the various geographical boundaries. This is due to the fact that in order to establish their influence and control on their target subjects, trust has to be developed between the locals and the foreigners and one way to accomplish that is through proper communication. It is time consuming and