How to defend fundamental liberty in times of national crisis is one of the greatest problems that the political leaders, lawyers and intellectuals are facing today. William Rehnquist, Supreme Court chief justice, said that the administrative authority to engage in conduct that…
However the alteration of the U.S. security system after 9/11 and various fresh national security agendas have produced extensive anxiety over the safeguard of international human rights, democratic standards, and several rights preserved in the U.S. Constitution that outline the civil liberties of the American citizens. Since the United States has not experienced any more attack on U.S. soil, which shows the efficiency of different U.S. counterterrorism efforts.
But the 9/11 terrorist attack led the U.S. administration to review several existing laws and strategies and to make fresh ones, mistakes and exceeding the limit associated with these labors added grave erosion of faith in U.S. guiding principles and direction. In foreign countries, exposures of extrajudicial apprehensions and detainee mistreatment have damaged U.S. status and sincerity. Further it hindered counterterrorism collaboration with allies, and endowed with provocative misinformation that helps terrorist radicalization. Internally, policy deviations over security and civil liberties have been recurrent, extensively revealed, and sensitively charged, creating a situation of animosity and doubt that has confronted the people’s faith in the administration, caused division among supporters, and destabilized collaboration among the political branches of government. (Prieto, 2009).
Criminal laws of US normally focus on dealing with criminal actions that have already happened, and are less effective in attaining the counterterrorism aim of preventing future attack. Criminal laws face a lot of disputes in tackling the terrorist threat. Even after a person is detained, a number of challenges face a successful criminal trial. Before 9/11, criminal trials relied on involving the defendant to a specific violent act or a plot to perform such an attack. The admissibility of evidence causes an additional challenge. Information that may be suitable in an intelligence framework may fail to suit the ...
Cite this document
(“Impact of the war on terror on Rules of Evidence Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/380106-impact-of-the-war-on-terror-on-rules-of-evidence
(Impact of the War on Terror on Rules of Evidence Essay)
“Impact of the War on Terror on Rules of Evidence Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/380106-impact-of-the-war-on-terror-on-rules-of-evidence.
The “War on Terror” is a blanket cause that allows the United States to intervene on any activities it considers to be terrorism. The war is fighting a faceless enemy, therefore it could be anyone. President Obama has chosen to withdrawal troops as well as focus on humanitarian aid.
This was the day America would never forget and forgive. America realized the gravity of terrorism and the situation for the first time what most nations face on daily basis worldwide. It was also not a welcome fact that post 9/11 we discovered that the terrorist outfits which attacked us were actually trained by us.
Strongest work The topic war on terror is the strongest piece of work. This was an argumentative essay over the current war on terror being fought by the United States of America against the most elusive enemy of all time. While writing this piece of writing and after carefully studying the background of this war, I realized that how much it would be painful to lose friend, brother, husband or any other relationship without any fault.
During the Cold War era, the world was seemingly divided into the communist bloc and the democratic bloc of states, headed by the USSR and the US respectively. With the inherent conflict between the permanent members of the UN, specifically, USSR and the US, the Security Council found it difficult to carry out its peacekeeping functions through its legitimization of forceful and military measures (Sahmoudi, 2010).
" (Thomas Diez 2006)
Governments of many western countries today have passed several legislations based on their anti-terrorists activity measures, which also have the effect of restricting the individual freedoms in a way that would not have considered legitimate prior to 9/11 incident.
The war on terror is going on thereby making the political grounds of the country vulnerable day by day and making more and more people psychologically weak. It seems as if both, 'war' and 'war on terror' has given nothing to the people but fear and anxiety to survive.
As most Americans are aware, the American strategy to conquer terrorism has been to take the fight overseas, to the Middle East, specifically Afghanistan and Iraq; the results of these conquests have been mixed, with some positive results and some negative.
The effects of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York, which resulted in more than 3,000 innocent people killed spread human misery further than those persons affected directly by the loss of lives. The U.S. economy was held
Due to this key position in the war scenario, the magnitude of losses, as compared to other participating nations of the world, was far greater for the US.
The writer is of the opinion that the outcomes of
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Impact of the war on terror on Rules of Evidence for FREE!