Robert Allio in his article, Bad leaders: how they get that way and what to do about them make a distinction of how bad leadership traits can make a CEOs function wrongly and forced him/her to make an exit. The scrutiny of leaders has become more far more intense on account of…
Bad Leader believes that employees working under him are basically lazy and the work, assigned to them, is distasteful to them. They assume that people are motivated by money. Leaders with bad leadership traits normally or wrongly assume that there must be very detailed work routines and enforced milestones to ensure that every work gets done.
According to Allio, a bad leader apart from failing both professionally as well as personally, would destruct the organizations and regrettably the employees and the shareholders A good leader must be tough enough to win a fight, but not tough enough to kick a man when he is down. They find strategies to increase the owners fund, encourage change in the wrong direction rather than resisting it. Further they influence their subordinate in a negative rather than coerce them into a positive path. The Bad leaders are corrupt, misguided and have disregard for the stakeholders. They bring disrepute to the organization and are painful to the employees. Dean B McFarlin & Paul D Sweeney in their book “Where EGOS Dare-The Untold Truth about Narcissistic Leaders & how to Survive them” defines Narcissistic Leaders as the ones who are fundamentally, insecure individuals who will crave adoration and will act in a negative way to get adoration, eventually only getting negative adoration. They compensate by projecting an inflated sense of self worth & competence to those around them.
The next important point raised by Allio in the article is that, most leaders start as visionaries having great ideals to lead the organization into high growth. They exhibit high integrity and they take the right path to retain the idealism for what they had dreamt of in the beginning. However, the environmental and resource constraints influences idealism and they become practical and think of alternative ideas. They start of in a big way but when their plans fail to deliver, they take wrong decisions ...
Cite this document
(“Leadership - leadership versus followership Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/380285-leadership-leadership-versus-followership
(Leadership - Leadership Versus Followership Essay)
“Leadership - Leadership Versus Followership Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/380285-leadership-leadership-versus-followership.
Leadership Examination. Leadership Strengths and Weaknesses. Understanding the key strengths and weaknesses have been cited as the first major steps towards leveraging them ensuring that the strengths are fully utilized while the weaknesses as supported in order to achieve a goal (Northouse, 2010).
Leadership denotes a combination of skills, which develop over a lengthy duration. Leadership mature as an individual encounter numerous situations that require such skills. The situations expose the individual to circumstances that test leadership skills.
The concept of leadership gives the student an opportunity to understand how best to guide and direct others in the organisation. Outside of management principles which include controlling, planning and organising, leadership theory provides students with real-life guidance for better loyalty development and followership.
It is also important to note that the overall relationship between the leaders and the followers also depends upon how the leaders actually perceive himself among the followers. Leadership models such as servant leadership require extensive support from the leaders in order to ensure that the leaders get the required level of commitment and loyalty from the followers.
Firstly, the researcher critically evaluates and reflects upon his current strengths and weaknesses in leadership and followership (competencies, knowledge, skills and attributes). Secondly, the researcher discusses the statement "Are leaders born or made?". Thirdly, he presents the difference between leadership & management.
Skills and responsibilities that are performed by a manager and a leader also totally differ from each other. Management involves accomplishing certain tasks and master routines while leadership involves influencing others and creating visions to cause change.
According to Drucker, if a manager provides clear objectives it will promote teams to effectively get tasks completed without direct managerial intervention and supervision. Drucker believed in the concept of a decentralised organisation, one in which knowledge-sharing moves horizontally rather than vertically, central to his philosophy that employees are assets within the business model and not a liability (Buchanan 2009).
As the paper stresses the Discussion explains first the basic premises about leadership effectiveness, then the various determinants of effective leadership such as the critical role of followers, the importance of attitude, emotional intelligence, social intelligence and the biology of leadership, the cognitive resource theory in effective leadership.
For this purpose the leader may follow a specific path. This path may come in form of an authoritative form of leadership, participative form of leadership, motivational, tactical or organizational approach oriented leadership. All these have their own requirements