Responsibility, guilt, blame, and culpability are four nouns that have been used over and over again when a discussion of the role of Germany and the First World War is initiated. Although A. J. P. Taylor (as cited in Pearce, 1997) makes a valid point when he compared tracing…
Furthermore, it also prevents the onslaught of another great war as leaders of the world will be able to learn from the mistakes of the past. This is also one of the main objectives of studying history in general.
Although it can be said that World War I is a topic that has been reviewed, analysed and debated upon over and over again, a discussion of why it started in the first place is still and will forever be relevant in the study of World History (Hamilton and Herwig, 2003, p. 1). Why is this so? While this task is quite daunting, it is necessary simply because the First World War has engendered, not only a transformation of Europe’s political map, but more importantly, a creation of a legacy that has changed the world (Pearce, 1997). The legacy of World War I includes and is not limited to World War II, the termination of Europe’s reign of supremacy, the emergence of Fascism, Nazism and Soviet communism, America’s rise as a “top nation,” and even the Great Depression (Pearce, 1997). In short, it is pertinent to history as it brought about a great change in the world—an event that is still making its presence felt through its ramifications. It is therefore highly significant to study the First World War and who is responsible for it in order to fully understand the start of Western “modern consciousness,” and as mentioned earlier, to be able to avoid committing the same mistakes critical to ensuing another world war (Pearce, 1997).
However, the impossibility of pinpointing a single and definite cause that led to World War I—as there are a combination of factors that can be traced decades before it happened—is a reality that cannot be ignored when attempting to answer the “why” aspect of the great war. And so, in order to fully present a logical, although contentious, analysis of the events that ultimately led to the First World War and ...
Cite this document
(“Discussion Theme: General war broke out in Europe in 1914 because of Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/380390-discussion-theme-general-war-broke-out-in-europe-in-1914-because-of-premeditated-german-decisions
(Discussion Theme: General War Broke Out in Europe in 1914 Because of Essay)
“Discussion Theme: General War Broke Out in Europe in 1914 Because of Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/380390-discussion-theme-general-war-broke-out-in-europe-in-1914-because-of-premeditated-german-decisions.
The interpretation takes on to a vulnerable history. According to Karl Marx, a developed country portrays an image to the future to the less developed countries. The Stages of Growth by Rostow is reinforcement of the traditional interpretation. The economic as well as social and political changes that occurred in Europe ceased from being dependant on agriculture alone and devoted a major proportion of the available resources towards production of non agricultural commodities.
The war started as a religious difference involving Protestants and Catholics in the Roman Empire. Later, the war progressed into a massive war incorporating a large part of Europe, for other reasons unrelated to religion, for example, politics (Cramer 16).
This supposedly led to Germany's declaration of war against Russia1. Germany's eagerness to go to war was due to a superiority complex that gave her much confidence that the war against France and Russia could be won in a very short span of time (Boyle, F.A.
because until then Britain had aptly deployed a diplomatic foreign policy, and had substantially refrained from wars and European predicaments (Turner, 1988, p.23). Britain was referred to as the possessor of “Splendid Isolation,” and, until 1900, it was not a part of any
This event set the course for activity heavy months of July and August.
The earlier part of July saw engagement of Austria and Serbia in ultimatums and souring of relationship. Count Berchtold was the center figure who represented Austria and he set forth number
ries and territories present different problems to companies, even those which are very large and which have the resources and the experience culled from decades of successful operations. Political changes, changes in the global economy, fluctuations in the exchange rates,