The discussion on alternatives to Military Action, especially Operation Desert Storm evaluates the possible alternatives like international negotiation, allowance of time for withdrawal and economic aid.
The Operation Desert Storm or ODS, the military operation conducted by the United States and its supporting nations against Iraq started in January 17, 1991, came to an end in February 28, 1991. National Security Directive 54, by former President Bush, which was issued in 1991 made clear that the main aim of ODS was to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait (Tragert 204). The National Security Directive 54 makes clear that Operation Desert Storm is a military action conducted with the help of the United States’ air, sea, and military forces coordinated with allied forces against Iraq, to withdraw from Kuwait. The ODS was a follow up action to Operation Desert Shield, a military buildup operation conducted in Saudi Arabia. The President George Bush declared a military action, namely Operation Desert Shield to strengthen Saudi Arabia against Saddam Hussein (Meisler 261). This operation aimed to maintain a military force in Saudi Arabia to defend Arab States from external and internal aggressions. Besides, the ODS, a 43 day air campaign was considered as the most successful war conducted by the United States and its allies in 20th Century. The root cause of ODS is the invasion of Iraq on Kuwait on August 2, 1990. The massive air offensive against the Iraqi forces in Iraq and Kuwait started in January 17, 1991.
The aerial attack by the allied forces totally destroyed the air defensive system, communication network and oil refineries in Iraq. In addition, the allied forces attacked the Iraqi ground forces situated in Kuwait and Iraq. In February 24, the ground defensive attack against Iraq started from the North Eastern side of Saudi Arabia to Kuwait and Iraq. In February 27, the allied forces captured Kuwait, drove the Iraqi forces from the invaded ...
Cite this document
(“The position of the USA in the first Iraq War (Operation Desert Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/380671-the-position-of-the-usa-in-the-first-iraq-war-operation-desert-stormods-an-example-of-multilateral-coalition-building
(The Position of the USA in the First Iraq War (Operation Desert Essay)
“The Position of the USA in the First Iraq War (Operation Desert Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/380671-the-position-of-the-usa-in-the-first-iraq-war-operation-desert-stormods-an-example-of-multilateral-coalition-building.
The purpose of this research is to investigate the following: classical realism and neorealist foreign policy theory on the US position; liberal foreign policy theories on the us involvement in ODS; constructivist approaches to foreign policy; realism and neorealist explanation of the US position on OIF; liberal theories and constructivist theories and their explanation of the US position on OIF.
The troops from the United States and from United Kingdom led this invasion. This paper tries to establish whether the Iraq War was worth the human and material costs suffered by the Allied coalition as well as the Iraqi people. The Iraq war was too costly to the United States, British forces, Iraq and the world as a whole.
After this point the issue of whether or not the operation was “joint” will be conducted. The issue of whether or not Operation Desert Storm was successful depends on the overall mission objectives. After the initial Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, it became clear that Iraq could also have posed a threat to Saudi Arabia.
In early 2002, General Franks’ “Generated Start” plan “called for very early infiltration by CIA teams, to build relationships and gain intelligence, and then the introduction of Special Operations Forces, particularly in northern Iraq and in Al Anbar province in the west”1.
The Operation Desert Storm and its Impacts on the Middle East.
The continuous trail of Gulf War is an explosive example of certain implications of some diplomatic realities that steered the politics of the Middle East during the end of the twentieth century.
would invade Iraq whether Saddam Hussein left or not. Two days later the war began with an air strike against Hussein and the Iraqi leadership. Ground forces (almost exclusively Anglo-American and significantly smaller than the large international force assembled in the first war) began invading the following day, surging primarily toward Baghdad, the southern oil fields, and port facilities; Kurdish and airborne Anglo-American forces opened a northern front late in March.
Answering these one by one will make the picture clearer.
It was known that for the U.S and its allies for a military intervention in Iraq, a prior authorization from the United Nations Security Council was a must. It is believed that the invasion of an independent country like Iraq was a breach of international law laid by the U.N.
When World War Two broke out, it was a signal that turbulent times were ahead. Men were recruited to fight for their countries. Women had no choice but to let go of their men. It was unknown to everyone what the future will bring, but when the war broke out, it seemed
It is submitted at the outset that the difference in the US approach in the two Iraq wars is intrinsically correlated to the political backdrop. This in turn has informed the US approach in both wars, which is further demonstrated by the US move towards a
30 Pages(7500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The position of the USA in the first Iraq War (Operation Desert Storm/ODS): An Example of Multilateral Coalition Building for FREE!