The title itself gives away the author’s leaning against Karadzic using the word “mock” – word that has harsh implications such as to treat somebody with scorn. Though according to the article the former Bosnian President has “demanded another nine months to prepare his defence” (Charter, 2009, para. 2) and “mock” can literally mean to prevent something, the choice of words connotes Karadzic’s actions to cause frustration or humiliation- a far too great accusation that becomes personal in relation to the judges present at the court. Other words used to describe Karadzic include “a psychiatrist who hoodwinked many with his disguise” (Charter, 2009, para. 3) and “wraithlike shadow” (Charter, 2009, para. 4). The first description already insinuates that the former Bosnian Serb leader is indeed already guilty of tricking his whole nation even before the trial has started. The writer here forgets that the trial is ongoing in the first place to assess whether Karadzic is guilty or not. The second description on the other hand is plainly a figure of speech- a rhetorical device that appeals to the imagination of readers to suggest how evil Karadzic is.
Upon further inspection of the way the article is written, the tone of the writer becomes apparent: he is the one who is in fact mocking Radovan Karadzic as he mimics the actions of the defendant by putting them into words in a demeaning way: It seems that his exasperation subsided when Karadzic “finally graced the UN war crimes court” (Charter, 2009, para. 1) – his tone condescending in even being patient for Karadzic’s arrival. The placement of certain facts and the pertaining to the defendant can put emphasis on ideas and also give away the inclination of the writer: The placement of “a psychiatrist who hoodwinked many with his disguise on the run as a New Age healer and who prides himself as a master of mind game”