The article written by Collier entitled Euthanasia debate reignited proffered arguments and counterarguments for the controversial subject of assisted suicide. He provided information that the issue had already been legalized in Oregon (1997) and Washington (2008), as well as in…
physical or mental pain without prospect of relief” and have “provided a medical practitioner, while appearing to be lucid, with two written requests more than 10 days apart expressly stating the person’s free and informed consent to opt to die”. Organizations opposed to the idea of euthanasia aver that the contentions were weak and insufficient. In particular the phrase: “appearing to be lucid” is subject to scrutiny and subjective assessment of its veracity.
Euthanasia has been specifically defined as “the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. The key word here is "intentional". If death is not intended, it is not an act of euthanasia.” (Euthanasia.com 1) The problem has been a source of controversial debate since people from diverse parts of the world hold various beliefs and values that run counter to the objective of euthanasia. Killing, has been viewed, as a criminal act and whatever purpose it deems to be achieved, it is still regarded as contrary to human law.
Organizations and states which supported and legalized euthanasia have done so on the grounds that patients who are in pain and suffering without any recourse for recovery should be accorded with the right to die with dignity. The issue therefore continues to be debated upon with an impending bill seeking amendment to the Criminal Code to permit the “right to die with dignity”.
The author concluded the article through inferring that despite identification of particular circumstances allowing euthanasia, it still could be subject to loopholes. Collier (2009, 464) specifically emphasized that the phrase “appearing to be lucid” is easily contestable given the state of physical and mental condition of the patients. In this regard, he is most likely arguing against euthanasia as a way to end a patient’s misery and pain.
The author identified what the particular circumstances are in considering medical practitioners ...
Cite this document
(“Euthanasia Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/381300-euthanasia
(Euthanasia Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Euthanasia Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/381300-euthanasia.
Euthanasia is commonly referred as ‘mercy killing’ or a ‘good death’. It entails bringing about the death of a patient in belief that the existence of the patient is so bad that he or she is better off dead than alive.
Legalizing Euthanasia. Euthanasia has been defined as the act of deliberately killing patients with an aim of reducing their suffering and pain. This paper looks at the various supporting arguments for euthanasia and the counteracting arguments to oppose the practice.
They include assisted suicide, active voluntary euthanasia and physician-aided suicide. In essence, these terms describe the ending of one’s suffering via termination of their life often via drugs administration. Today, Patients Rights Council (2012) reveals that assisted suicide is considered illegal in 47 U.S States apart from Washington, Montana and Oregon which support physician-assisted suicide.
Coming closely to the quarters of the press which is mingling with the advertising regimes and the advertisers in particular, it makes all the more significance that the newspapers and magazines get more and more advertisements so that their budgets are controlled in an automated way and also so that the employees working under the aegis of the press get salaries and perks from time to time.
death free of anxiety and pain brought about through the use of medication or deliberately putting an end to someone’s life in order to spare the individual from suffering”. Euthanasia is therefore believed to be beneficial to the person on whom it is brought about because