In 1970, a pregnant woman (Norma McCorvey, who was called Jane Roe in the case filings to protect her privacy) filed suit against the District Attorney of Dallas County, Texas, Henry Wade, on the grounds that the Texas law prohibiting abortions except for in cases of proven rape…
Justice Blackmun, writing for the majority, acknowledged that the state had an interest in regulating abortion as a way to reduce medical risk for women and to protect the lives of unborn children but argued that a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy must be weighed against the rights of the state. As long as the fetus is not viable — the Court used an established definition of viability, which considered a fetus viable at the point it is able to live outside its mother, even if some artificial assistance is needed for it to do so — the state can only regulate abortions in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health. For abortions prior to the end of the first trimester, the Court held that the state should not interfere and should leave the decision-making to a pregnant woman and her doctor. Only for abortions during the third trimester of pregnancy, when the fetus is viable according to the Court’s definition, could the state prohibit abortion and only then if doing so did not significantly threaten the health of the pregnant woman.
Blackmun went on to state that in questions of abortion, there is no consideration of a fetus’s right to life under the protection of the Fourteenth Amendment because the Fourteenth Amendment protects only Americans who have been born. There is no Fourteenth Amendment protection for the unborn. Blackmon adds, in note perhaps to the spirit of the times, that the Court’s ruling is not intended to serve as an answer to the question of when life begins but only as a statement of the reach of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Roe v. Wade remains a milestone case, setting the stage for countless arguments between those who support abortion and those who would do away with it. Though I agree with the gist of the Court’s decision — that a woman should be able to obtain a legal abortion, especially early in pregnancy — I find the legal basis for the Roe v. Wade decision a little shaky. Protecting the right to ...
Cite this document
(“Roe v. Wade Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/381579-roe-v-wade
(Roe V. Wade Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Roe V. Wade Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/381579-roe-v-wade.
The ruling of the high court in respect of this case brought a major change, leading to the legalization of abortion.Today, abortion is considered to be the right of the woman in respect of the fourteenth Amendment of the US constitution. The following sections of the paper are dedicated to discussing the Roe v. Wade case.
This issue remains central and people who support or oppose abortion are very passionate about it, so that four decades since the Roe v. Wade ruling, there seems to be no relenting by the two sides. This is because of varying views caused by differences in culture, religion and politics.
Wade has been the subject of a constant, divisive public and political debate regarding its moral, ethical and constitutional merits. The plaintiff, Norma McCorvey, who represented all women who are pregnant in the case, used the alias
This decision in effect, legalized abortions rather than decreeing a ban on the practice. The decision raises the ethical issue of whether it is morally right to allow precedence to a woman’s right to choose as opposed to the rights of the unborn fetus that is
on, made without any assurance of protection or threats and “with complete familiarity of his legal privileges, including any declaration which he made might be employed against him. Later, Miranda’s admission was allowed into testimony at the trial, and he was sentenced
In fact, even countries where abortion is permitted by law, women always have severely limited access to safe abortion due to lack of proper regulation. But not all countries prohibit all abortions. A small group of these countries allow abortion at least to
Justice Harry Blackmun reasoned that the state often increases its prenatal life concern as the pregnancy advances. The state may forbid abortion during the third trimester of the pregnancy, but still Harry argues that any woman is entitled to abort freely if she had
Secondly, does the due process clause of the 14th amendments in US protect the right to privacy? Thirdly, are there circumstances where a state may establish laws that prohibit abortion? Fourthly, did the fact