When the case White v White was decided by the House of Lords many academics and legal commentators saw this as marking a revolutionary change in the law relating to matrimonial property and financial provision upon divorce. In light of the subsequent developments can this case…
critically evaluate the impact of the decision by the House of Lords in White v White1 in relation to division of assets and financial provisions on divorce. In particular, this paper critically reviews the White decision and considers the extent to which the decision has actually culminated in a revolutionary change in the law relating to matrimonial property and financial provision on divorce. Moreover, I shall comparatively analyse the UK legal position with the approach in other jurisdictions where appropriate.
From a family law perspective, the issue of rights to the family home have continued to be problematic and decisions in ancillary relief proceedings were addressed by the House of Lords’ decision in White v White2. This decision changed the approach to assessing financial settlements on divorce and introduced the “yardstick of equality” principle as a means to ensure fairness in the division of assets between divorcing couples. Whilst heralded as a welcome decision in introducing some much needed clarity to the division of assets on divorce3, it has been argued that such an approach is inherently dogmatic in failing to specifically address the division of rights to the family home particularly where children are involved4.
Although the reasoning in White v White specified that there was no presumption of equality on divorce, if the court intended to depart drastically from an equal splitting of assets they should have satisfactory justification for doing so. Furthermore, the governing legislative provision in this area of law is the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA) and section 25 of the MCA provides the court with a very wide discretion of factors to take into account on division of assets, with the welfare of a child being paramount5.
As such, it is submitted that the overriding statutory requirement to consider the interests of the child inherently limits the application of White v White to cases where children are not involved as the ...
Cite this document
(“Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words - 4”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/382895-law
(Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words - 4)
“Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words - 4”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/382895-law.
Trademarks and service marks are words, names, symbols, or devices used by manufacturers of goods and providers of services to identify their goods and services, and to distinguish their goods and services from goods manufactured and sold by others (Radcliffe and Brinson, n.d.).
Secondly, the study seeks to find out whether legal origin and shareholder protection are associated in any way, and whether countries with the common law origin show signs of robust development of the stock market, compared with countries that mainly apply civil law.
I conducted further research on the Incorporated Council of law reporting for England and Wales only to find that it has been in existence since 1865 and prove to be an authority on both law and its accurate reporting. The fact that the Council operated as a charity served to further convince me of its dedication to accurate reporting and its commitment to do with no consideration for financial gain.
(Melone and Kames, 63) The proscribed form for lodging these disputes was by way of a writ which set out specific claims and remedies. (Melone and Kames, 63)
The Royal courts were divided into three common law courts. They were the
Secondly, all citizens, regardless of rank and file, are equally accountable to the laws, as administered in the courts. Thirdly, constitutional laws do not provide the source of the rule of law but is the consequences of the
w” has an evolving history starting from the local traditions of the Anglo-Saxons times in the fifth century and culminating in the modern approaches where continental laws are gaining importance. The main sources of English Law are as follows:
In 1215, the King Council’s
When a case is decided by a judge then his decision and the basis of the case becomes a precedent which other courts follow while deciding a case which is similar in nature. The systems of rules of Common law is dependent more on