This paper is a critique of the article by Readdick and Chapman about the perceptions of young children towards the technique of social isolation called “time-out” that is used by parents and kindergarten teachers to punish children for undesirable behaviour. This paper…
The term refers to the punishment of young children in this case and hence the title could have been a bit wordier without sounding verbose.
In this section, I analyse the problem statement and definition of the issue that the article deals with. The problem statement can be expressed as follows: Though there have been studies’ detailing the effects of “time-out” as a punitive measure, there has been little focus on the perceptions of the children themselves on the measure as a tool to punish bad behaviour and inculcate good behaviour. The purpose of the article is to conduct a survey among the target population of children older than two or three years and study the children’s attitudes towards this form of punishment and whether it acts as a deterrent or do the children perceive it as just another punishment.
As discussed in the section on literature review, the problem statement is consistent with the literature review. To take one instance, the article quotes studies by Betz (1994) about how the “time-out” does not teach desirable behaviour and the popularity of the technique as evidenced in the study by Webber and Scheuermann (1991). The other sources that the authors use to justify their focus on this specific problem statement are the ones by Dobson (1978) and Twiford (1984) who extol the virtues of “time-out”.
The problem statement is not reformulated and the concluding remarks by the authors are about how further research needs to take place to validate their preliminary findings. Further, there is no discussion on limitations that the study has and though the scope is defined, it is more of a methodological approach to the problem statement by using surveys as a method of arriving at the results rather than a clear definition of what is in scope and what is out of scope. The point here is ...
Cite this document
(“Research critique (Criteria for the Evaluation of Educational Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/383333-research-critique-criteria-for-the-evaluation-of-educational-research
(Research Critique (Criteria for the Evaluation of Educational Essay)
“Research Critique (Criteria for the Evaluation of Educational Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/383333-research-critique-criteria-for-the-evaluation-of-educational-research.
It is because of the diverse nature of the qualitative research approach that critical appraisal becomes cumbersome for the researchers who are less accustomed with these methods (Stige & et. al., 2009). In other words, it can be mentioned that because of the subjective nature of the qualitative research it becomes difficult to effectively critique them (Lee, 2006).
This paper shall critique the research, “Impact of a fall prevention programme in acute hospital settings in Singapore” by Koh, Hafizah, Lee, Loo, and Muthu (2009). It shall provide a critical evaluation of the research, identifying its strengths as well as its weaknesses.
Alarm hazard is a problem in concern in this research article. The technical default in cardiac monitor alarms is been studied in this article. The article investigates whether changing electrodes daily decrease the quantity of cardiac monitor technical alarms.
Reference to two chosen research articles will be used to illustrate how those styles are used. Those articles are," Does the Auditory Saltation Stimulus Distinguish Dyslexic From Competently Reading Adults" by Joanna Kidd and John Hogben (2007) and "In Maturation of Visual and Auditory Temporal Processing School-Aged Children" by Piers Dawes and Dorothy Bishop (2008).
ized as it does not only clearly and concisely summarize the key points of the research paper: purpose, design, sample, key results, but more so, it is cohesively structured, that despite spme missing important terms, the thought remains comprehensible. Also, although the
The rationale for choosing the article critiqued is based on its relevancy to area of study and career growth. It is also professionally and precisely written making it enjoyable to read and understand.
and Pringle, A. 2014. ‘Motivate’: The effect of a Football in the Community delivered weight loss programme on over 35-year old men and women’s cardiovascular risk factors. Soccer & Society. 15(6): 951-956.
The aim of the research was clearly laid out
For example, some of the researchers interested in preeclampsia include Hernández-Díaz, Toh & Cnattingius and many others. In order to understand the disease and to determine whether some of these findings can be applied in the nursing practice, a critique of the
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Research critique (Criteria for the Evaluation of Educational Research) for FREE!