Moon and Peter Woolliams examines the complex subject of cross cultural business ethics. Increasing globalisation leads to increasing contact and cooperation in the work environment between members of different cultures and societies. Globalisation opens…
Pitfalls through misunderstandings or misinterpretation of intent can easily lead to the collapse of a potentially successful business partnership or cooperation – the article by Moon and Woolliams looks at how these cultural differences may be interpreted and what approach to take when working with people from different cultural backgrounds.
Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner compiled a database with 50,000 cases from 100 different countries to investigate the cultural differences in work ethics around the world and to assist managers in solving conflicts in cross-cultural business scenarios (1993 and 1998). The database was extended in 1999 in order to investigate and help solve problems arising from cross cultural misunderstandings.
One of the objectives of the database was to formulate a global theory for international business ethics but the compiled data and scenarios question whether that would be a possible achievement or whether it would even be a desirable outcome, given the vast differences in business ethics in different cultures.
For the purpose of their study Trompenaars and Woolliams selected 40,000 cases from 60 different countries and presented a questionnaire with 58 questions to managers with exposure to multi cultural scenarios at their workplace. The researchers took great care to ensure that translation of texts conveyed the same meaning in all languages used in the research and ensured that participants understood that the research was independent and that anonymity was guaranteed to all participants to promote frank and open answers to all scenarios. The reliability of the data results was tested using Cronbach’s Alpha test (a test developed to estimate the consistency reliability of psychometric tests).
It became clear that responses varied depending on the cultural background of the participants. Answers varied in particular where they were given in response to ...
Cite this document
(“A critical, cross-cultural Evaluation of a Journal Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/386336-a-critical-cross-cultural-evaluation-of-a-journal
(A Critical, Cross-Cultural Evaluation of a Journal Essay)
“A Critical, Cross-Cultural Evaluation of a Journal Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/386336-a-critical-cross-cultural-evaluation-of-a-journal.
Besides evaluating the external environment of the host country, organizations also need to evaluate and manage cross cultural issues also. 2. (Chen,Sun,& McQueen, 2010) Cross culture management is considered as everybody’s challenge and increasing globalization as well as movement of labor force from one place to another has made it possible that people from diverse cultures will work together.
Qualitative analysis will in most case bring out issues more clearly to be understood much better in context, which in most cases will facilitate a qualitative researcher to immerse themselves in such a social setting (Hugh, 2006). Therefore, there has to be application of inductive reasoning in such qualitative analysis, which involves investigation of relationships between meanings and human actions (Anderson, 2006).
Cross cultural management (CCM) is defined by Soderberg and Holden (2002) as the discipline of international management that focuses on encounters of a cultural nature that occur between homogeneous and well-defined entities (such as between two distinct countries, ethnic groups, races, etc.).
Different countries and regions have differing cultural and traditional practices that affect significantly how they conduct business and relate with people. Culture plays an integral role in every society and it has developed into distinct and non-identical feature of every human being.
d their Head Office and Tokyo Design Studio, Minato, Tokyo have been selected for comparison and to study their cultural differences ( Mitsubishi Motors 2010). These have been particularly chosen because the Japanese and the US culture are very different. Moreover, these two
The major challenge is usually in overcoming cross cultural differences. As a large telecommunication, to be successful in our plans of expanding to international markets, we will have to understand and effectively deal with the issue of cultural differences
Hall, a well known anthropologist from America.
Low context culture: A low context culture can be defined as the communication in which major part of the information is present in explicit code and little is
the modern business organisations towards performing their respective business activities effectively (Vettorel, 2011). To be noted, the concept of ‘cross-cultural communication’ fundamentally emerged from ‘cultural anthropological studies’ followed in diverse cultural
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic A critical, cross-cultural Evaluation of a Journal for FREE!