On the other hand, a growing number of information is now accessible through internet and various media types. There is then a conflict on who to believe when it comes to nutrition. In this case, although voluntary registration appropriately assesses capabilities of public health nutritionists, there is still a need for mandatory regulation and accreditation as a professional body in United Kingdom that will address the complex nutritional demands of its citizens.
British culture in relation to food made some gradual alterations. As surmised by Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2008), “there is a healthier pattern of intake… but there is still need for immediate actions to ensure further improvements in patterns of food consumption and intake of several nutrients.” In this area, although progress has taken place, guidance to guarantee its continued rise is still required. The role of organizations is to keep up with the current trend. Presently, the Nutrition Society is the leading organization in the “advancement of scientific study of nutrition and its application to the maintenance of human and animal health” (Buttriss & Daniels, 2003). This ensures proper screening of individuals and legal organizations in nutrition and related fields. The said organization offers a voluntary approach in registration processes, wherein “assessment mechanisms focuses on attainment of minimum standard of competency in knowledge, skills, and attitudes on the required tasks” (Davies, Margetts & Hughes, n.d.). The minimal techniques employed seemed to contradict the graveness of the situation involving the present overall nutritional status of British people. Specifically, Nutrition Society initially was in charge during the creation of voluntary registration for public health nutrition (PHN). In an article entitled Overview of the Public Health Nutrition Landscape (Anon., n.d.), it defined public health nutrition as