Importance of Making the Decision - Case Study Example

The four principles needed to consider while making the decision are autonomy, Nonmaleficence, Beneficence, Justice, and Fidelity (Miller and Davis, 1996).In this case, the main problem is to choose a person who will contribute to the development of the company and at the same time leads to change, empowerment, and transformation. If Liz is selected, she will be the first African woman manager and can do an average performance with a high energy level. It will also help her personally a lot. Roy, a white person has sacrificed even his family for the company while his performance is average to low. He has twenty years of experience. Quah’s performance level is high but she will go to any extent for reaching her goals and her experience is also low. She is very bold as evident from her previous experience.

In this case, the principle of autonomy means that the candidate needs to be independent and the candidate needs to make clear and rational decisions. Based on this principle, Liz and Quang are the top candidates. This is because Roy’s son got engaged with the vice president’s daughter, which seemed like a company affair to get a promotion for Roy. Hence, Roy cannot be considered the best candidate according to the principle of autonomy. Based on the principle of Nonmaleficence, the decision should not do any intentional harm to others (Kitchener, 1984; Rosenbaum, 1982; Stadler, 1986; Forester-Miller & Rubenstein, 1992).

Liz is the best person based on this principle. Based on the principle of beneficence, the decision needs to contribute to the welfare of the person. This is because of her commitments and financial problems According to this principle also, Liz is the best candidate. The principle of justice means treating others as equals with their differences and being able to give a rationale for the difference in treatment (Kitchener, 1984). According to this principle also, Liz is the best candidate. “Fidelity means loyalty, faithfulness and honoring commitments” (Miller and Davis, 1996, p2). Based on this principle, Roy and Quang are the best candidates. This is because Roy has 20 years of experience, and sacrificed even his family for the company. At the same time, Quang devotes sixty-hour weeks and produced very high records for the company.

In this case, the principles of Nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice can be given the most priority. Thus, the two best candidates based on these principles are Liz and Quang.
SWOT Analysis
Solution 1
Strengths
1. Experience
2. Transformation
3. Welfare of the candidate
Weaknesses
1. Allegation of showing Personal preference
2. Difficulty in Managing the Staff by Liz

Opportunities
1. Empowerment
2. Transformation
Threats
1. From Vice President

Solution 2
Strengths
1. High Performer
2. Committment to Work
Weaknesses
1. Criticism from sales staff
Opportunities
1. Boldness in making decisions
Threats
Less experience in the industry
4. Choice
Liz is the best candidate to be promoted since if she is promoted she can contribute to the company with her experience and energy and can contribute to empowerment and transformation. Read More