September 11 and the United States’ Afghan” has been an important article dealing with the new kind of war proposed by the U.S. in response to the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. The declaration of President George W…
different kind of conflict’ in order to determine if this new kind of war confirms the new trends in war which were referred to as ‘the transformation of war’ and ‘new wars’ by scholars of the 1990s. According to the author, the body of literature a decade before 11 September asserts that a new kind of warfare began to emerge in the West during the 1990s. “This article examines whether 11 September and its immediate aftermath – the US campaign in Afghanistan – confirmed these trends, or whether it really did constitute a different kind of war. It does so through a four-part framework: that during the 1990s wars were localised; that the enemy was not a state but a regime or individual leader; that civilian deaths should be minimised; and that wars were fought on behalf of the West by professionals, but that the risks to these forces should also be minimised.” (McInnes) Therefore, the article by Colin McInnes undertakes a significant investigation of the new kind of warfare which started in the 1990s and announced later by the U.S. following 11 September terrorist attack. This paper makes a profound exploration and review of the article “A different kind of war? September 11 and the United States’ Afghan” incorporating a brief overview of the article, an analysis of its strengths and weaknesses, and an engagement with a counter-perspective to that outlined in the article.
In a reflective exploration of the article by Colin McInnes, it becomes lucid that the author undertakes a thorough analysis of the period of tension in the western nations which led to the emergence of ‘the transformation of war’ and ‘new wars’. According to the author, war in the West during the twentieth century was dominated by the experience and the fear of total war. After the period of the Cold War, it was widely agreed upon by the major Western powers that the era of total war was over. However, there were several military operations in the West on a regular ...
Cite this document
(“Article review on A different kind of war September 11 and the United Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/390865-article-review-on-a-different-kind-of-war-september-11-and-the-united-states-afghan-war-colin-mcinnes
(Article Review on A Different Kind of War September 11 and the United Essay)
“Article Review on A Different Kind of War September 11 and the United Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/390865-article-review-on-a-different-kind-of-war-september-11-and-the-united-states-afghan-war-colin-mcinnes.
Conversely, as the pace of the war increased, the war crossed over to the territory of the United States. It caught up with most American passengers travelling to Europe. Particularly, these passengers encountered the trade war perpetrated by the Britain and Germany.
George Washington’s farewell address best explains what isolationism is: “The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very remote relation.
As a matter of fact, there are only a few nations in the world history that have transformed as rapidly as the United States from a relatively isolated, agrarian, rural, and backward nation into one of the most industrially advanced pluralistic and urban societies in the world.
Amin resisted pressure and refusal sealed his fate. In the following weeks, more than 100,000 men of Soviet motorized units backed by armored and artillery occupied positions near the Afghan border. On Dec. 24, units of the 105th Airborne Division Guards began to land at Kabul airport, establishing a bridgehead from which began its offensive, capturing several air bases, the buildings of the Ministry of Interior and the telephone exchange.
While many can understand the need to go after those very groups that seek to cause harm to others, as well as whatever groups exist that harbor such individuals but for many, the road traveled toward such a goal, has been incredibly costly. Such costs that have come in the form of empty seats at the dinner table for Christmas and Thanksgiving and also the economic cost.
The North (Union) fought to prevent a threat to the Union while the South (Confederate) fought for independence and a particular institution, slavery. Historians have long debated on the causes as well as why the South lost the war. Progressive historians stressed that the economic gap between the North and the South was the cause of the war.
Hundreds of people were killed in these attacks; however, the Global War on Terror, which was counter-response of 9/11 attacks, deteriorated lives of millions of people around the globe that associated al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussain behind the 9/11 attacks.
to the American government in terms of policies and social systems, the same allies became the enemies of America and thus the only target for our military. The theme of the writing is clear since it shows how the mistakes made by the government have cost the people dearly
The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks triggered policy-making from the government. It also prompted military action and retaliation against Afghanistan which was harboring Osama bin Laden, the terrorist responsible for the bombings. Surveillance operations have been increased with higher funding directed towards policing and security services.
18 Pages(4500 words)Term Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Article review on A different kind of war September 11 and the United States Afghan War COLIN MCINNES* for FREE!