Lately, knowledge processes have been identified as an integral input towards innovation dynamics. The following is a discussion on how knowledge management influences the innovation dynamics.
The gurus of the subject proclaim knowledge management as a provider of strong roots for higher efficacy level in innovation dynamics. In particular with the ever rapidly changing dynamic and competitive markets that exist today, Dalkir (2005) states that the businesses have to look forward for technological advancements, embedded with experiences of the past ‘grey-hair’ individuals, holding experience of decades. The innovation dynamics existing today in the present century are bound to affect the current business outlook, and some of the most influential factors are as follows:
Therefore, it can be safely assumed that technology would have a significant impact on the way managers in the future entertain a situation. Innovation does not apply to the product but to the processes as well; many a times an innovative move in the process gives a big boost to the product features and entitlements. Innovation, at its grass roots is supported by knowledge management, and its description is discussed as follows.
In accordance with the Harvard Business Review (1998), knowledge really defines the basis of innovation, leading in turn towards developing a competitive advantage, which is critical for sustainability in the markets. As illustrated from experiences and extracted from various literature, for survival and sustainability in a cut throat competition that exists today, it is critical for a firm to develop a competitive advantage; though one would really want this to be un-replicable but today due to the existing advances in technology, spying and other advancements, it is not possible to retain a competitive advantage for a longer period of time – technologies and
Innovation dynamics are defined by Frappaolo (2006) and Davenport (2000) as the rules that lead the definition of innovation or the fundamental rules that define a product or service being innovative. Innovation dynamics are generally considered to be technology oriented and in…
As the assembly line was refined, Ford looked to the way in which the worker was engaged in the process and provided an incentive through welfare capitalism to create loyalty and promote stakeholder philosophies. In addition, he promoted the consumerist philosophy so that the workers could afford the products they helped to make, thus increasing demand.
Conclusion 13 References Appendices (Words 3152) Abstract The expansion of knowledge sharing in all human activities reflects the value given to the particular process. Because of the involvement of knowledge sharing in various tasks, its characteristics are differentiated, in accordance with the conditions of the social, economic or business environment.
Innovation is by far one of the most critical tools of competency for firms and has been the key element in steering organizations towards unprecedented success Technology has played a key role in helping organizations innovate and excel in the contemporary world
29) with well-established theoretical underpinning, has emerged to become the top investment priority of many business organizations. Effective implementation and performance of knowledge management is largely associated with the intellectual capital of a firm and as a result it affects innovation and financial success as well (Ju, Li and Lee, 2006, p.
Modern organizations should promote innovation and knowledge management as a measure to increase their competitive power. According to Bordia, et al (2005, p.1), Innovation is the ability to develop new products and services. In his opinion, innovation helps companies in value creation and thereby increasing their competitive power.
in their article, 'Preliminary Study: Knowledge Management (KM) Practices In The Small Medium Software Companies,' in the Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, August 2005, knowledge management is something by which a company can leverage the tacit and explicit knowledge of its employees, trading partners, and outside experts for the benefit of the company.
Therefore, it became necessary to seek a study which explores the myth and reality of KM and based on empirical study gives a unbiased and objective result based on empirical studies.
The methodology chosen was the Kaplan and Norton Balanced Scorecard method which measures the degree of success of KM on FSA, the case study that has been taken up to validate or negate the hypothesis regarding success or failure of KM on business enterprises.
According to the study, in a rapidly changing competitive market, organizations are driven to create changes and implement innovations not just within their workforce but most importantly in their products and services. Innovation has been associated with the overall growth and enhanced the performance of organizations through the improvements in their effectiveness, productivity, competitive advantage and most importantly, the quality of their goods.