In many ways, behaviors of human beings are quite inescapable. The inherent nature present for many, to act in a certain way at a specific given point(s) in time. The actions taken, which in turn, enable the opportunity for living longer and also, more prosperous. In terms of the proponents of the existence of global warming, they seek to rely heavily upon the principle that, with these behaviors taken by those who reside on the planet, they have in turn placed the planet on a downward spiral of increased peril as its potential resolution.
To seek the best possible resolution to the consideration of the global warming issue, it would be best to assess the impact of human nature, whatever it would be, upon the continued increase of heating that the earth has seen in recent decades. As for the definition of human nature, it is described as being the, “ .. range of human behaviour that is believed to be invariant across long periods of time and across very different cultural contexts. Sometimes debate on this subject is phrased as the quarrel over nature versus nurture, but that phrase can be misleading,” (“Human nature”, p.1). The very behaviors that have left many of those in the scientific field, feeling as if the internal cause and motivator of global warming, has in fact been the behaviors exhibited and the inherent nature of human being themselves over periods of time.
Many scientists, as well as global warming sympathizers, have sought to amplify what they feel to be a considerable problem, in terms of the prolonged health of the planet. Questioning the planet’s ability to sustain life, whether it is human, plant, or animal, as generations come and go. In this example, “The planet is warming, humans are mostly to blame and plants and animals are going to dramatic lengths to cope. Thats the consensus of a number of recent studies that used wildlife to gauge the extent of