The characterization benefit of the approach outlined by Neal and Remer (2006) is for gathering and interpreting the key competing arguments and preferences empowers the project team to react and proactive accordingly.
According to Neal and Remer (2006), is in the immediate need to move forward the global decision initiative strategy by extending the management school of thought sector to natives and out of the area students to the convergence thought. In connecting with the management school of thought sector demonstrates the baseline of a long-time networking opportunity for growing the convergence thought promotion campaign message. In addition, the data revealed will outline the students that will be focus on for the determined school of thought.
In addition, the main characterise aspects of the chosen journal by Imogen Neale and Ashley Remer (2006), Global Convergence and Local Divergence, outlines how competing arguments to determining the most cost effective means to implement management school of thought initiatives are on using diversified stimulus. The key characteristics of the specific thought process are a critical review of statistical data to the trends both inside the convergence thought limits and the outside of the immediate area. The statistical findings will provide an excellent outlook to cater to the proposed global decision initiative determined school of thought.
Further, the designed Global Convergence is the focus on highlighting those likes and working to improve on the dislikes relating to the convergence thought will assist in moving forward the global decision initiative plan. An outlook into the documented attitudes of management protocols and outside students will encourage a serious dialog with the management school of thought rationale approach – that will project the strategic timing for implementing certain rolled out management strategies