l, namely: Study 1 (N = 528) which examined sex differences in sources of anger and upset (e.g., about sexual aggressiveness or withholding) among 2 samples of Ss differing in age and marital status; Study 2 (N = 60) which assessed the perceived magnitude of upset each sex would experience when confronted by each source; and Study 3 (N = 214) which tested predictions within married couples about sex differences in sources of marital and sexual dissatisfaction.
These studies, according to Buss, provide modest support for the strategic conflict model and implicate the negative emotions of anger and upset as proximate mechanisms that alert men and women to strategic interference. Moreover, the diversity of upset elicitors discovered here (being condescending, possessive, neglecting, abusive, inconsiderate, moody, and self-centered), point to the limitations of this evolutionary model and the need to develop more comprehensive models of conflict between the sexes.
At a closer look, the following observations and comments have been drawn: First, the highly selective samples of American college students and their generalizability may be limited. There is an uneven distribution of subjects, with 51 men and 56 women.
Second, the reliance on self-report measures, although that has been the methodology of choice in most research examining sexual desires may not yield and objective result. Self-rating method can be bias in the sense that the subjects feelings and prejudice may interfere with the results.
Moreover, the subjects have so many differences. They come from different backgrounds and have differing knowledge and perceptions of the same and opposite sexes of participants. They also differ in dating history and marital status. The ones with longer dating history may have different perceptions and experiences with those of short-term dating. The married ones, divorced, widowed and singles have definitely different experiences and maturity.
In addition, this is a ...
Cite this document
(“A critique on Buss's strategic conflict model between two sexes Term Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/395003-a-critique-on-busss-strategic-conflict-model-between-two-sexes
(A Critique on Buss'S Strategic Conflict Model Between Two Sexes Term Paper)
“A Critique on Buss'S Strategic Conflict Model Between Two Sexes Term Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/395003-a-critique-on-busss-strategic-conflict-model-between-two-sexes.
K. Thomas identified five styles of behavior in conflict resolution: competition, cooperation, avoidance of conflict, compliance and compromise. Like any other aspect of organizational behavior, style of conflict resolution is subject to significant influence of national cultures.
Causes of conflicts Conflicts at workplace can arise out of several reasons – conflicting needs, conflicting lifestyle, conflicting goals, conflicting ideas, conflicting pressures and conflicting roles. In addition conflicts could arise out of different personal values and unpredictable policies (Gatlin, Wysocki and Kepner 2008).
Principled stance on every issue necessarily creates partisanship and gridlock in attempting to create legislation in response to problems. In the 1790s, one could clearly see a polarized American government, divided between two major competing factions: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.
Marriage is a foundational relationship in American society. According to Gottman and Carrere (1994), 90% of Americans will marry in their lifetime. However, it is found that nearly 44 percent of marriages end in divorce (Teachman, 2009). United States government data demonstrated a slight dip in the divorce rate from the 1980s to the 1990s.
It will also strive to compare other scholarly work in relation to conflict resolution and management while highlighting on some of the possible techniques used in conflict resolution at work places. Introduction Conflict resolution can be defined as the process through which disputes between individuals are solved.
ent of conflict resolution at the highest level, when the struggle between powerful forces that were highly antagonistic to each other was going on unabated. Those forces were Capitalism, Communism and Nazism, each trying to gain supremacy over to rule the world. Just as every
However, a principled stance on every issue necessarily creates partisanship and gridlock in attempting to create legislation in response to problems. In the 1790s, one could clearly see a polarized American government, divided between two major
The outcome of this HIS strategic research is expected to illustrate a strategic appraisal and introductory determining factors for implementation in acknowledging areas that need improvement and enable effective preparations for prospective
This paper seeks to discuss homelessness as a social problem in United States and in Canada.
Individuals who are estimated to be homelessness in Canada are 200,000 to 300,000 while in United States the figure of
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Term Paper on topic A critique on Buss's strategic conflict model between two sexes for FREE!