We have succeeded in inventing the modern vehicles to be at ease while travelling, the modern machinery to help us complete our work accurately and speedily, built factories to increase production and still struggling to bring more…
Smoke from cigarettes is affecting the environment as a whole and is also affecting the individuals who smoke. This is the very reason that smoking is being banned in public places so it cannot harm other individuals. This argumentative essay would further expand the points of smoking ban on public places and would provide with a definitive conclusion as to which side is more convincing (Vallero 2008, Goudie 2000 & Cooper 2001).
The proponents of the ban on smoking in public places present with researches carried out on the topic which clearly shows that smoking in these public places is harmful to the health of many individuals who are exposed to the smoke involuntarily (Carb 2003). They argue that the smoke in these public places can cause non smokers to passively smoke and some asthmatic patients can have a triggered asthmatic attack because of it. (National Health Survey 1994). Similarly patients who are already suffering from fatal diseases would be triggered by this tobacco smoke if they are exposed to it highly as reported by the CDC (Washington Post 2004). They bring forward laws which provide every human life in this world with the right that they should not be exposed to carcinogens which would affect their health and if this ban on smoking does not take place then these individuals would be exposed to the carcinogens of cigarette (U.S Department of Health and Human Services). They also bring forward other harms which may be caused by cigarette smoke to the society. The cigarette butts that are left behind by the smoker can be a cause of fire at many places and by imposing ban on smoking the government can ensure that these incidents are avoided (Daily Courier 2004). Similarly it is found that these butts of cigarettes also constitute a great part of the litter found on the beaches and if bans are strictly imposed on these recreational places the cost of cleaning the places would be much low. (Chicago Sun Times 2003). It is seen that many of the ...
Cite this document
(“Ban smoking in public places Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/396286-ban-smoking-in-public-places
(Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/396286-ban-smoking-in-public-places.
However, drugs and smoking are not the solution of any problem, but are the reason of upcoming health and psychological problems. Smoking has been declared as a more severe risk to human life than other addictions. A question has been raised, as a society, what can we do to prevent tobacco from raging death on so many people?
Smoking is no longer considered as a stress reliever and is considered hazardous not only to the smoker himself but also to those who are present around him. For the smoker, it is active smoking; while, for those around him it is called passive smoking in which people inhale the smoke of cigarettes because of a smoker present in the surrounding.
It helps people relax, provides income for governments through taxes that contribute in many ways to the public purse". Introduction In the United States alone, it is estimated that almost 45 million people- or 21% of the adult population, smokes on a regular basis.
The dangers of smoking are not new to mankind. The first hint that smoking was a health hazard dates as far back as the 18th century according to experts but it wasn’t until the 1920’s that serious research began about the hazards of smoking to health. Even then researchers had concerns about the hazards of smoking as they pertained to second hand smoke and people who inhaled it(Comfort pp 14).
It may be possible that tobacco smoke ay not strictly be categorized under the definition of chemical pollution. However, there is no denying of the fact that cigarette smoke leads to the addition of x, y z in the air. The harmful effects of these components have been established in numerous research and studies
nd takes аwаy from them their freedom; on the other hand, however not banning it is unfair to the nоnѕmоkerѕ and puts our health in danger making it unѕаfe for us to go to public places where there are ѕmоkerѕ. This is quite understandable that ѕmоkerѕ have certain
This has prompted many governments to find mechanisms of reducing access to cigarettes by running adverts and antismoking campaigns, and forcing cigarette manufacturers to place warning signs on cigarette packets.
Some smokers die prematurely from smoking-related illnesses that occur after a prolonged period of smoking. Most smokers do not live their full lives; some of them die of preventable illnesses such as lung cancer. Opponents of
The most predominant eras where political figures established their dynasties and forms of power was between the 1920s and the end of the World War II (Neville 34). The world’s political arena was a disaster and disorganized because most leaders performed
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Ban smoking in public places for FREE!