The Parliamentary Commissioner Act of 1967 has suffered from various loopholes mainly with respect to the manner of filing complaints to the Commissioner. Necessary amendments are also not made to the Act from the time it has been adopted. “The parliamentary Commissioner Act…
The Parliamentary Commissioner Act was authorized to deal with matters of mal-administration. But the Act failed even to provide a definition for the term mal-administration. It has also been said under the Parliamentary Commissioner Act of 1967 that the complaints have to be made through a Member of the Parliament. In most of the cases, the Member of Parliament himself tries to solve the dispute and does not send it to the Parliamentary Commissioner. This restriction is illogical and it cannot be seen to it that that the grievances of the citizens would be served without bias in such circumstances. The trust and confidence of the people cannot be gained when there is such a limitation in any legislation. “It is sometimes further argued that if the PCA appears too demanding and, a fortiori, if he were afforded coercive powers, he might exacerbate the very problems he is expected to solve. Administrators may be reluctant to take bold decisions for fear of the consequences; ‘defensive administration’ might be undertaken: time-wasting procedures designed not to further administrative efficiency but to deflect criticism.” (Fenwick & Philipson 2003, p. 240).
According to this Act, the Ombudsman looks into complaints in which that information illegally suspended by the government authorities, but no lawful solution has been offered to them in the cases of breach of the Code by the authorities. This Act has not given much wider powers to the Ombudsman when compared to other nations but it has been argued that the act implied gives various powers. “Under s 5(1) of the Parliamentary Commissioner Act of 1967, the Ombudsman can take up a complaint only if the citizen has suffered injustice as a result of maladministration; both maladministration and injustice must be shown and there must be a casual link between them.” (Fenwick 2002, ...
Cite this document
(“Administrative Justice - Proposal for the Parliamentary Commissioner Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/396421-administrative-justice-proposal-for-the-parliamentary-commissioner-act-2010
(Administrative Justice - Proposal for the Parliamentary Commissioner Essay)
“Administrative Justice - Proposal for the Parliamentary Commissioner Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/396421-administrative-justice-proposal-for-the-parliamentary-commissioner-act-2010.
The Act provides that an employer need not treat an employee, a former employee, or a job applicant, worse than any other person due to a protected characteristic thereto considered as direct discrimination needs. In this regard, the Act provides that in a situation of maternity or pregnancy, this direct discrimination can arise simply if the individual has the characteristic considered protected without the need to compare such treatment to other individuals.
1 Section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provides that courts are required to interpret national legislation in such a way as to ensure that they are consistent with human rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.2 However, in practice Parliament seemingly ceded parliamentary sovereignty relative to Convention rights to the judiciary.
The Trade Practices Act of 1974 was framed keeping in mind that there should be some legislation to ensure that consumer welfare is not exploited by any corporations. The main idea behind the formation of the Trade Practices Act was to ascertain that the Parliament, be it Federal or State, can use some tools to guarantee the individual rights as consumers.
In July 2011, the law commission released a report on public services ombudsmen entitled Law Com No 329, Public Services Ombudsmen (HC 1136 2010-11). In this report, the law commission made a number of recommendations concerning the public services ombudsmen.
Extended Essay on the New Equality Act 2010 Introduction Inequalities in societies have existed from the historic times. There have always been male and female, Rich and poor, educated and non educated and superior and inferior. These inequalities have found their way in the modern society.
There are new changes that have been brought in the new provisions fundamentally and there occurrence frequency in future. With this regard, there is evidence that the defendant id behaving badly (has bad character) when she/he has otherwise mis-conducted him/herself (the defendant has criminal convictions).
105). It is a system built on the notion that individualized guidance f high risk youths, undertaken before the impressionability f adolescence passes, can avert their slide into a life-style f crime or nonproductive dependency on the state. If it is thought f in this way, juvenile justice can be considered the most massive institutional, secondary prevention effort ever mounted to deal with adolescents' antisocial activity.
nty, as explained by professor Dicey, is that there are no limits to the legislative competence of parliament is absolutely sovereign in its own time and may legislate as it wishes on any topic and for any place.”1
If the House of Commons and the House of Lords pass the
ty, the laws recognize the diversity of the workforce as well as the provision of services and property.1 The implication of such view is the enactment of various legislations to promote equality of justice of the disadvantaged or vulnerable groups. Equality may imply different
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Administrative Justice - Proposal for the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 2010 for FREE!