He agreed to work last Wednesday night at the Red Lion Club. The Club agreed to provide Freddy with all the necessary equipment for his show including a selection of 50 records. The Club also agreed to pay Freddy £60-00 for his performance on…
However, when Freddy arrived he found that there was only a selection of 35 records available. He there upon informed Richard, the manager of the Red Lion, that he could not perform under these circumstances and left the pub immediately.
Richard was furious, he told Bill to leave the equipment set up and began telephoning around to find another DJ. He eventually found a DJ called Sally who agreed to perform at that Red Lion for £150-00. Richard agreed to pay this fee; but when she arrived she found that Bill had taken down all the equipment and had gone home shortly having done so. Richard was forced to pay two local boys £35 each to set up the equipment for Sally.
Freddy and Bill are demanding their fees of £60 and £20 from the Red Lion Club. Richard has refused to pay them and is threatening legal action by the Red Lion which is an incorporated company against Freddy for Breach of Contract.
In the above, it is necessary to discuss whether either party can sustain a claim for breach of contract. In order to do this it is necessary to discuss the formation of a contract and the issue of privity of contract with regard to any potential claim Bill might have. From this is should be possible to advise the parties with regard to any monies they might be entitled to.
The formation of a contract requires there to be an offer1, followed by acceptance2, and then consideration. If all three elements are present the court will generally rule that the contract has been fully constituted. In the above, the contract has been created between Richard and Freddy, with Freddy offering the services of Bill to assemble the equipment, and Richard acting on behalf of the Red Lion Club.
When considering privity of contract it is important to note in this case that privity exists between Richard and Freddy. Privity can be horizontal or vertical. Horizontal privity would occur in the case of Bill as he will be getting the benefits from the contract made between ...
Cite this document
(“Law case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/399906-law-case
(Law Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Law Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/399906-law-case.
Antitrust laws can be defined as acts adopted by congress to ban or hinder business practices considered being monopolistic or restraining interstate commerce. A clear example is the Sherman antitrust Act of 1890 between states or foreign countries.
Thus in the case in question, the common law is taken into consideration. In some nations, the dispute may fall under the federal doctrine while in the United Kingdom; there is use of the U.K law to solve the dispute. This is especially when a member of the public is part of the dispute as seen in the case of Spiliada Maritime V Cansulex.
A competitor then opened nearby. This competitor was part of a well known chain of photocopying shops and as such had access to cheap overseas supplies of laminating and copying materials. Consequently, the competitor was able to undercut Beth's business.
“The term quasi-contract is a more accurate designation of contracts implied in law. Implied contracts are as binding as express contracts. An implied contract depends on substance for its existence; therefore, for
In regard to the entry of judgment of the ruling, Dr Netzley was granted motion for a new trial on the basis of juror confusion in regard to interrogatory and verdict forms and the judge’s reference to excluded evidence
The plaintiff Mr. Tompkins, a citizen of Pennsylvania, complained in a Southern New York Federal court. His complain was that he had been injured by a passing train, while he was on his way home, after being dropped by his friend at
Karen claimed that Dean Witter had been issuing false information regarding the performance of the investments. When still a customer to Dean Witter, Howsam and Dean Witter had entered into an agreement
The administrative tribunals on the other hand have the powers of making decisions that deals with the matters of the constitution (Willes & Willes, 12). The Broadcast regulator has the powers of a regulator. It has the powers to cancel
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Law case for FREE!