StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu
  • Home
  • Subjects
  • Miscellaneous
  • The priciple of equality that Peter Singer defends in his book Practical Ethics has radical consequences. Critically discuss the principle, explaining some of its consequences, and assess whether Singer is right that we ought to adopt it

The priciple of equality that Peter Singer defends in his book Practical Ethics has radical consequences. Critically discuss the principle, explaining some of its consequences, and assess whether Singer is right that we ought to adopt it - Essay Example

Extract of sample
The priciple of equality that Peter Singer defends in his book Practical Ethics has radical consequences. Critically discuss the principle, explaining some of its consequences, and assess whether Singer is right that we ought to adopt it

Some of Singer’s theories about equality can therefore be challenged by logic, and not accepted, by people who, for example, see a difference between animals and humans, in terms of the equality applied and implied to them.
When Singer talks about equality, he rejects the traditional Rawls-influenced notion of moral personality and human equality. Singer proposes a broader and more collectivist ethics, and therefore his idea of equality is also broader. However, there needs to be an alternative to this philosophy because it is untenable and seeks a level of sophistication which the author frequently is unable to convey appropriately, as seen by his use in the following sentence of creative semantics within their rhetoric. “The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been witholden from them but by the hand of tyranny (sic). The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor” (Singer, 1989). Singer’s essay, which proposes to have a utilitarian argument structure, is basically all about morality, and it corresponds to the rightness or wrongness of an action that impacts that action’s significance in terms of utility.
This concept of utility has been stretched and formed the main basis for those who would criticize Singer’s embrace of the equality of animals and humans, as a dry and humorless statistical impossibility that drained the imagination out of humanity and based impulse on quasi-scientific ethical propositions. This is a valid criticism in the light of various authors’ use of utilitarianism, but it is also important to keep in mind that utilitarianism is basically a positive principle that lays out a plan for happiness, not equality. In ...Show more

Summary

When Peter Singer talks about the principle of equality in his book “Practical Ethics,” the end result of this discussion is potentially controversial. The principle of equality in Singer’s work can be rationally defended from many perspectives, especially when it is…
Author : mkuhlman
The priciple of equality that Peter Singer defends in his book Practical Ethics has radical consequences. Critically discuss the principle, explaining some of its consequences, and assess whether Singer is right that we ought to adopt it essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"The priciple of equality that Peter Singer defends in his book Practical Ethics has radical consequences. Critically discuss the principle, explaining some of its consequences, and assess whether Singer is right that we ought to adopt it"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Famine, Affluence and Morality by Peter Singer
The situation he describes is one that could be told forty years later in the same words and same context, which is to state that little has changed in bridging the gap between the world’s poorest people and the richest societies economically, or even with regard to the most basic aspects of standard of living such as adequate food, shelter, and health care.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Peter Singer: Charity and Duty
The title of the essay is an unambiguous ‘signpost,’ and makes the subject of the piece, and its purpose, self-evident. It is a rousing call to awaken the conscience of the affluent, and make them accept famine relief as a moral duty. Singer makes a well-reasoned argument against “the present division between acts of duty and acts of charity” (9) which prevail in contemporary Western society.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Peter Singer and Garrett Hardin On Helping the Poor
Mr. Singer argues that, in no uncertain terms, the world is not doing enough to help those that need it, and in fact those that can help have a moral obligation to do so. Mr. Hardin argues that while help is certainly possible for those that need it, the likelihood of being able to help everyone is a reality that will never be attained due to the limited amount of space and shrinking resources.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Kant and Singer
According to Peter Singer, we must not act so as to sacrifice a major interest for a minor interest. Singer is an Australian moral philosopher whose approach and ethical view is from a preference utilitarian perspective. This principle argues for equal consideration of interests.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Singer moral principle. Peter Singer and greatest happiness principle
In this article he has emphasized on two issues. One issue is an analogy provided by him. In this analogy he mentions that if a child is drowning in a pond then we should save him if there is no fear of risking our lives in that act. If we really face such a situation then it would without doubt be a moral obligation to save the child.
7 pages (1750 words) Book Report/Review
Peter singer and john arthur
Extending the argument further Singer says that if a child were drowning and there were many people around standing and watching, it would
9 pages (2250 words) Essay
Peter singer
His works have had the most prominent impacts on public opinions unmatched by the works of any other philosopher to date. Singer is an avid supporter
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Peter Singer
e highly acclaimed philosopher and educator from Princeton University had been taking bullets for his much controversial stand regarding issues that are quite sensitive to the prickly society. He had authored several high- profile writings that had critics question his
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Philosophy - Animal rights & liberation article by Peter Singer
This is termed as ‘speciesism’ by Singer. However, according to the scholar, nonhuman beings too have interests and rights, and
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Philosophy - animal rights by Peter Singer
He says that when a ‘reservoir’ is constructed, though people express concern that it would drown a valley teeming with wildlife, the reason behind this concern often lies in the fact that the valley has
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Hire a pro to write
a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment