With increasing availability and ease of accessing information online, private companies, insurance firms and health service providers are rapidly tapping into the e-medium to provide better health services, improve businesses and increase their customer outreach.
The cost-free factor of these technologies is an attractive initiative for a number of firms with a high customer base to adopt EMR with minimal investment on time and human resources.
EMR is also gaining popularity amongst the patients or recipients of health services, especially in areas that are far away from good hospitals. The patients can view their medical records, test results and history online at the comfort of home or at work (Kolbrum, 2008).
However, with the rapid rise of readily available sources online for EMR, it is fair to question whether the EMR is well-protected or easily accessible to the public. With the internet flooded with spam and the ever-present danger of hackers breaking into confidential online records, are the patients safe online? Is convenience too close for comfort?
The concerns mentioned in the paragraph above will be addressed throughout the course of this paper which seeks to justify whether all good things in life are (really) for free, find ways to ensure which EMR platforms are the safest to use, and gain insight into important privacy laws that offers protection to the patient’s personal health information.
The need for EMR was realized in the 1960s, when it was felt that there has to be an automated system for the re-organization and management of patient records to enable improved provision of health services to them. Laurence Weed, a physician, was the first to propose and describe the idea of computerized medical records or EMR (Pinkerton, 2008).
Progressing through the 1990s, as the computer became more handy and sophisticated, the EMR systems also became complex and in wide use by the companies and medical institutions (Pinkerton, 2008). Today, in 21st century, the commonality and stress on the use of EMR is so immense that the firms are now availing and adopting the systems for free, just like Email Accounts.
Going back to argument where Google and Microsoft were stated as examples, it is understood that ...
Cite this document
(“Privacy of lectronic medical records Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/400866-privacy-of-lectronic-medical-records
(Privacy of Lectronic Medical Records Research Paper)
“Privacy of Lectronic Medical Records Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/400866-privacy-of-lectronic-medical-records.
YOUR NAME HERE YOUR TUTOR HERE COURSE HERE DATE HERE Will Electronic Medical Records Really Improve Health Care? Outline I. Introduction II. Advantages of EMR a. Storage space improvement b. Workflow process efficiency c. Cost savings d. Federal funding incentive support III.
I want to discuss the reality of what it delivers and not the conspiracy fantasies that float around its inception. At a basic level of analysis, Google Medical Records is a system for the storage of Medical information. If that were all, there would be no miracle involved.
Tatum states, “Electronic health records are copies of an individual’s medical history that is stored as electronic data”. According to Walker, Bieber, and Richards electronic medical records improve communication of clinical data that facilitates doctors and concerned health professionals carry out their duties effectively and efficiently.
Butler and Lathram (2005) state that it is one of the main tools currently being used to fix the ailing health care system through patient monitoring which will enable doctors to shift from only curing ailments to preventing them instead. One of the main goals for using this system is to increase efficiency within the healthcare system to the point of significantly reducing health care costs while saving millions of lives.
Significance of confidentiality of healthcare information has increased with dynamism in the health care sector. Approaches to care provision, incorporating third parties such as information technology assistants, and integration of information systems for centralized data access are some of the challenges that have threatened data access to third parties within healthcare facilities and outside the facilities (Talbott and Hales 145, 146).
What medical information should be confidential? Who, if anybody, should have access to medical records?
Research indicates that medical facilities across the United States have been slow in adopting the innovative technology of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in comparison with several other countries that have readily accepted and welcomed the new technology in their medical facilities.
I also thank my family for their financial support and their academic support. To all, I say thank you. Abstract Coming up with an Electronic Medical Record is a key concern and objective for many countries, so as to improve their healthcare delivery. However, in order to do so, there is need to have patient repositories.
These physicians claim that they have problems related with costs, data entry, technicalities, usability, and confidentiality of information and the security of the EMRs. These have generated heated debate about the usefulness of