This is an issue that is frequently debated but remains, in the view of many people, unanswered. Nevertheless, it is still a crucial issue to deal with because the idea that leadership is mostly inborn still strengthens the way that multitudes of people…
The first scientific investigations of leadership, performed in the 1930s, were interested with naming several individual psychological qualities that may differentiate leaders from non-leaders. Eventually, this became widely recognized as ‘The Great Man’ leadership theory (Hersey, Blanchard & Johnson 2008).
They also determined that the qualities they had classified seemed to vary randomly, differed from leader to leader, and merely became evident after individuals had attained leadership positions (Kouzes & Posner 2007). This was a normal outcome of the reality that they may only examine leaders after the incident, when they had become leaders themselves. Additional research suggested that the relationship between leadership and particular leadership attributes is insignificant, comprising only roughly 10 per cent of the aspects that determine whether an individual was a leader or not (Kouzes & Posner 2007). Unexpectedly, further research has failed to resolve conclusively the issue ‘Are leaders born or made?’ and this lingers a subject of intense debate among scholars. In terms of this ongoing debate between nurture and nature, this essay will try to answer this lingering issue of leadership by drawing on concepts of human motivation and various leadership approaches. However, as Gardner (1990) argued: “Many dismiss the subject with the confident assertion that ‘leaders are born not made.’ Nonsense! Most of what leaders have that enables them to lead is learned. Leadership is not a mysterious activity… And the capacity to perform those tasks is widely distributed in the population” (p. xv).
Stogdill (1974) emphasized that “there are almost as many definitions of leadership as there are persons who have attempted to define the concept” (p. 259). This essay does not aim to add still another definition. However, there are fundamental defining components of leadership in ...
Cite this document
(“Are leaders born or made Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/401738-are-leaders-born-or-made
(Are Leaders Born or Made Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words)
“Are Leaders Born or Made Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/401738-are-leaders-born-or-made.
Is it only about inspiring others? Does the much hyped up political or religious leaders are the only kind or there exist many leaders around us in all strata’s of life varying in magnitude. If true than what are the different types of leadership. This paper aims to offer a dynamic theory on leadership development and will study literature examining trait(s) which are argued as genetic, whilst counterargument with the notion that leaders are a lot more made than they are born (Zenger et al 2007, page 5).
Research (David Giber, Linkage Inc, 2009) has proved that if we tie leadership development to business strategy and need of the business it results in excellent organizational growth. The pressure to integrate leadership development activities and initiatives in the overall strategic objective of the business is the most important and overarching trend in recent history.
Use the other essay provided as an example of how to structure. There doesn’t need to be much written to restructure, just reword some things so it doesn’t sound like a story, (more third person) Create a model that suggests that Leaders are Developed more than they are Born and apply this to the real life working environment.
Leadership comes with specific qualities, insight, observation, and a clean character. In contemporary organisations, where leadership demands supreme importance, effectiveness is achieved through management principles in addition to leaders’ qualities.
Roberts 1994 and Sinetar 1981] that say leadership is something that could be taught and every one in the society can learn these abilities through development programs. Demonstration of great behavior makes a leader great. These behaviors can also be taught to people in leadership positions.
Knowing the points will support to grow effective leaders for corporation. It looks like there is just a single thing that one requires to essentially be born with, in order to be a leader afterwards in time. That is brainpower. A leader has to be sufficiently
It was with his book about political leadership in 1978 that he presented in front of the world two concepts of transactional and transformational leadership. While drawing a line between these two modes of leadership,
Born leaders are the leaders who are able to lead and conduct the community without any formal training or education and possess natural leadership skills. A born leader must have some of the following traits to be able to lead the
Many people will argue that way. Some researchers have argued that leadership is a trait or behaviour. Leadership is a calling that comes from within, and cannot be forced. Leadership cannot be created, taught, learned, or promoted, just like Drucker argued that leaders
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Are leaders born or made for FREE!