Within a few days of the disaster, the news coverage was being handled by outsiders and the international media that took over the role of primary producers of content.
When the Haitians are given a chance to speak about or communicate about the events happening there in the aftermath of the disaster, the local perspective is obtained. However, because of the proximity of Haiti to the US and the fact that many international journalists have been around other disaster zones and hence the reporting is sensitive to the needs of the Haitians. However, the coverage would have been more vocal if the Haitians were commenting on their own affairs as the sense of despair and helplessness felt by Haitians can be captured only if they get a chance to express themselves.
The point here is that the coverage has ranged from balanced to hysterical to paranoid depending upon the news outlet and the medium that is carrying the message. Hence, the question of who comments on the news is as important as who is reporting on the events.
2) A) Though I would not agree with Stephen Brunt’s generally negative view of athletes as role models, nonetheless, I find merit in his arguments about young boys and girls blindly aping the athletes. This is because I feel that athletes perform in a single area of sport and are uni-dimensional in that sense. However, their performances on the field are something to be emulated though the same cannot be said of their exploits off the field. Hence, one has to exhibit a sense of discretion when following athletes as role models.
B) The male athlete who can be a good role model would be Roger Federer. This is because he is the epitome of discipline and focus and tennis being such a demanding sport needs lot of talent and practice to go hand in hand to make a champion that is Federer. Further, his off-court demeanor is exemplary as well in the way he takes care of his family and his humility as well as affableness add to